1993
DOI: 10.1177/014920639301900403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Configuration Research in Strategic Management: Key Issues and Suggestions

Abstract: This paper discusses major theoretical and methodological issues that strategic management researchers must consider when developing and testing configuration theories. The theoretical issues include: (1) number of domains, (2) causality, and (3) temporal stability. The methodological issues are: (I) specification of key constructs, (2) effects of data aggregation, (3) the choice of unit of analysis, and (4) the appropriateness of research methodologies. Greater attention to these issues should result in more … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dess, Newport and Rasheed (1993) consider that the typologies must refer only to a system of conceptual classification from a theoretical perspective. For this reason, the researcher traces a conceptual framework developed "a priori," and once designed, it would be empirically tested (Cousté, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dess, Newport and Rasheed (1993) consider that the typologies must refer only to a system of conceptual classification from a theoretical perspective. For this reason, the researcher traces a conceptual framework developed "a priori," and once designed, it would be empirically tested (Cousté, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Configurations are a means of achieving parsimony while presenting rich, complex descriptions." [18] Configurations normally relate attributes from multiple domains. An important characteristic of a configuration is its internal consistency: its "internal logic, integrity, and evolutionary momentum" [44].…”
Section: Method: Dialecticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test relied on expert assessment of senior researchers and professionals. The study espoused the views of Dess et al (1993) that, "when a construct or a set of dimensions exhibits a strong content validity, there is a tendency among researchers to accept them without rigorous testing of other components of validity such as convergent, discriminant or nomological validity" (p. 785). Reliability test for equivalence was undertaken through questionnaire pretesting by a pilot study of 20 randomly selected universities within the population.…”
Section: Sample Size Power and Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%