1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.59.14005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Configuration-interaction approach to hole pairing in the two-dimensional Hubbard model

Abstract: The interactions between holes in the Hubbard model, in the low density, intermediate to strong coupling limit, are investigated by systematically improving mean field calculations. The Configuration Interaction basis set is constructed by applying to local Unrestricted Hartree-Fock configurations all lattice translations and rotations. It is shown that this technique reproduces, correctly, the properties of the Heisenberg model, in the limit of large U. Upon doping, dressed spin polarons in neighboring sites … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C i,j shows a maximum (0.021) when the holes are separated by a vector r ij = r i − r j = (0, 2), that is when they are two lattice constants apart along the stripe direction. This feature of the hole-hole correlation differentiates stripes from other two hole configurations investigated within the t − J [22] or the Hubbard models [23,18]. We note, however, that C i,j is also rather large (0.011) for the hole-hole separation at which the results reported in those studies show the maximum hole-hole correlation, namely, r ij = (1, 1).…”
supporting
confidence: 41%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…C i,j shows a maximum (0.021) when the holes are separated by a vector r ij = r i − r j = (0, 2), that is when they are two lattice constants apart along the stripe direction. This feature of the hole-hole correlation differentiates stripes from other two hole configurations investigated within the t − J [22] or the Hubbard models [23,18]. We note, however, that C i,j is also rather large (0.011) for the hole-hole separation at which the results reported in those studies show the maximum hole-hole correlation, namely, r ij = (1, 1).…”
supporting
confidence: 41%
“…In addition, one needs to consider quantum tunneling processes between degenerate, or nearly degenerate, Hartree-Fock solutions, when there are many. This is achieved with the Configuration Interaction method (CI), widely used in quantum chemistry [17,18]. The combination of the Hartree-Fock and CI methods gives reasonable results even when applied to one dimensional systems [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible solution to both problems is offered by the Configuration Interaction (CI) method. [62][63][64] In this approach, the ground state is constructed as a (biased) linear combination of HF solutions. This technique, which has already been applied to certain aspects of the isotropic Hubbard model, 63,51 can be shown to give a systematic description of quantum fluctuation and tunneling corrections to the HF solution, and of the quantum dynamics of the excitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Given the fact that the set of all possible Slater determinants (with all possible occupation numbers) generated from a complete set of one-electron orbitals constitute a complete basis of the N e -particle Hilbert space, our aim is to pick out a subset of Slater determinants which captures the essential physics of the exact solution.…”
Section: B Configuration Interaction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%