The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confidence Sets for Cohen’s d effect size images

Abstract: Highlights Confidence Sets (CSs) extend the idea of confidence intervals to fMRI maps. For a Cohen’s threshold upper CS asserts where lower CS where . We demonstrate the CSs method on HCP subject-level Cohen’s d data. We compare the CSs with results from standard statistical voxelwise inference. Unlike tra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our proposed methods still rely on hypothesis testing using SEI so are not completely free of the limitations of PVT. For imaging, modern approaches that construct confidence sets using effect size thresholding approaches or Bayesian inference procedures hold promise as true alternatives to PVT-based inference for neuroimaging (Bowring et al, 2019(Bowring et al, , 2021Chen et al, 2019;Sommerfeld, Sain, & Schwartzman, 2018). Our suggestions here of EST demonstrates the advantage of considering alternatives to classical PVT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our proposed methods still rely on hypothesis testing using SEI so are not completely free of the limitations of PVT. For imaging, modern approaches that construct confidence sets using effect size thresholding approaches or Bayesian inference procedures hold promise as true alternatives to PVT-based inference for neuroimaging (Bowring et al, 2019(Bowring et al, , 2021Chen et al, 2019;Sommerfeld, Sain, & Schwartzman, 2018). Our suggestions here of EST demonstrates the advantage of considering alternatives to classical PVT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this article, we argue for using an effect size-based CFT, instead of a threshold based on a p-value. Our suggestion is motivated by increasing criticism of PVT in the context of hypothesis testing and an increased interest in potential alternatives (Bowring et al, 2019;Bowring, Telschow, Schwartzman, & Nichols, 2021;Chen et al, 2019;Chen, Taylor, & Cox, 2017;Wasserstein & Lazar, 2016;Wasserstein, Schirm, & Lazar, 2019). This approach resolves the limitations of PVT stated above: (a) Using effect size thresholding (EST), the set of voxels that are identified as activated in an analysis does not depend on the sample size, so it improves the consistency of the target regions of activation across studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See also Bowring et al (2021). Please note that for conventional one-sample t-tests √ ′( ′ ) − = √ 1 and DoF=n-1, and for conventional two-sample t-tests √ ′( ′…”
Section: Standardized Effect Sizes For T-tests In Fmrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, with a very high number of participants an analysis will in most cases deliver a large number of significant voxels. In most cases it is also conceptually more interesting to know whether the activation of a brain region is more or less strongly associated with a specific behavior or intervention (see for example Bowring et al, 2019;Bowring et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation