2021
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain‐wide inferiority and equivalence tests in fMRI group analyses: Selected applications

Abstract: Null hypothesis significance testing is the major statistical procedure in fMRI, but provides only a rather limited picture of the effects in a data set. When sample size and power is low relying only on strict significance testing may lead to a host of false negative findings. In contrast, with very large data sets virtually every voxel might become significant. It is thus desirable to complement significance testing with procedures like

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to statistical analysis, effect size calculations were also performed to compare the effect of the sample size of each group. Due to the difference in group size, corrected Cohen’s d (Hedge’s g) was used to estimate the effect size and aid in result interpretation ( Gerchen et al, 2021 ; Pernet et al, 2021 ). Following the rule of thumb set by Cohen, an effect size of 0.2 is considered as a small effect, 0.5 as a medium effect, and 0.8 as a large effect ( Lakens, 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to statistical analysis, effect size calculations were also performed to compare the effect of the sample size of each group. Due to the difference in group size, corrected Cohen’s d (Hedge’s g) was used to estimate the effect size and aid in result interpretation ( Gerchen et al, 2021 ; Pernet et al, 2021 ). Following the rule of thumb set by Cohen, an effect size of 0.2 is considered as a small effect, 0.5 as a medium effect, and 0.8 as a large effect ( Lakens, 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each NF and transfer run, connectivity estimates corrected for age and gender as covariates were compared between the two groups with one-sided independent samples t-tests implemented in a GLM model. Hedges’g and its confidence interval were estimated based on the obtained t-values to estimate the effect size per run 37 . Pearson’s correlations were used to assess associations of offline and online connectivity with respiratory parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to generate further exploratory value from our analyses, additional voxel-wise calculations of ES and corresponding confidence intervals were performed post-hoc. The procedure follows Gerchen et al (2021) . In short, whole brain two-sample t -tests were calculated in SPM12 for the contrast “alcohol > neutral” for “males > females.” Using the resulting t-maps and applying the “g_es_ci” Matlab script ( Gerchen et al, 2021 ), the standardized ES Hedges’ g and the corresponding 95-% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for all voxels in the nine ROI separately.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure follows Gerchen et al (2021) . In short, whole brain two-sample t -tests were calculated in SPM12 for the contrast “alcohol > neutral” for “males > females.” Using the resulting t-maps and applying the “g_es_ci” Matlab script ( Gerchen et al, 2021 ), the standardized ES Hedges’ g and the corresponding 95-% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for all voxels in the nine ROI separately. Subsequently all ROI masks were resized to the same MNI dimensions as the ES g-map.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation