2008
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2008.4518603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confidence scores for acoustic model adaptation

Abstract: This paper focuses on confidence scores for use in acoustic model adaptation. Frame-based confidence estimates are used in linear transform (CMLLR and MLLR) and MAP adaptation. We show that adaptation approaches with a limited number of free parameters such as linear transform-based approaches are robust in the face of frame labeling errors whereas adaptation approaches with a large number of free parameters such as MAP are sensitive to the quality of the supervision and hence benefit most from use of confiden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The M-MPE-conf criterion can be defined in a similar manner. Note that due to the quality of the confidence metric, thresholding the confidence scores after feature selection can often result in an improved accuracy, as reported in [12]. On the one hand, the experimental results for word-confidences in Figure 12 and state-based confidences in Figure 16 suggest that the confidences are helpful, but on the other hand that the threshold itself has little impact due the proposed M-MMI-conf / M-MPE-conf approaches, which are inherently robust against outliers.…”
Section: Confidences For Unsupervised Discriminative Model Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The M-MPE-conf criterion can be defined in a similar manner. Note that due to the quality of the confidence metric, thresholding the confidence scores after feature selection can often result in an improved accuracy, as reported in [12]. On the one hand, the experimental results for word-confidences in Figure 12 and state-based confidences in Figure 16 suggest that the confidences are helpful, but on the other hand that the threshold itself has little impact due the proposed M-MMI-conf / M-MPE-conf approaches, which are inherently robust against outliers.…”
Section: Confidences For Unsupervised Discriminative Model Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although the prior transcript in that case contains errors, adapting on that transcript disregarding that fact generally still results in accuracy improvements [12].…”
Section: Decoding Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another publication Frinken [3] utilizes the concept of co-training, where two systems try to improve each other. Still all those methods rely on some small amount of annotated data [4] or a bootstrap system [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many publications have shown that the application of confidence scores for adaptation can improve recognition results. However, only small improvements are reported for confidence based CMLLR adaptation [1] or MLLR adaptation [6,14,16]. In this work, we present a novel unsupervised confidence-based discriminative model adaptation approach using a modified MMI training criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%