2022 ACM/IEEE 13th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/iccps54341.2022.00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confidence Composition for Monitors of Verification Assumptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intuitively, what this definition means is that if the state estimator says that there is probability p that the system is in state s, then the system will be in state s with probability p. Calibration is an increasingly common requirement for learning-based detectors [16,27,14,31], and we validate it in our experiments. Now we are ready for our main theoretical result: assuming that M AS is conservative with respect to M OS and that the state estimator is well-calibrated, we show that the safety estimates of our monitoring are conservatively calibrated.…”
Section: Conservatism Guaranteesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Intuitively, what this definition means is that if the state estimator says that there is probability p that the system is in state s, then the system will be in state s with probability p. Calibration is an increasingly common requirement for learning-based detectors [16,27,14,31], and we validate it in our experiments. Now we are ready for our main theoretical result: assuming that M AS is conservative with respect to M OS and that the state estimator is well-calibrated, we show that the safety estimates of our monitoring are conservatively calibrated.…”
Section: Conservatism Guaranteesmentioning
confidence: 94%