2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2015.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cone-volume measure of general centered convex bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, we conclude (10). It follows from (10) and Lemma 3.2 that for the L 1 function f =f n n+q , we have…”
Section: Some Preliminary Estimatessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In turn, we conclude (10). It follows from (10) and Lemma 3.2 that for the L 1 function f =f n n+q , we have…”
Section: Some Preliminary Estimatessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…A good way to do that is to contrast the Gauss image problem with a specific Minkowski problem, say the log-Minkowski problem. The cone volume measure of a convex body has been of considerable recent interest (see, e.g., [9,12,13,16,25,26,43,44,54]). The conevolume measure V K of a convex body K is a Borel measure on the unit sphere, defined for Borel !…”
Section: Definition Two Borel Measures and Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if we do not use it in this paper, we point out that F. Barthe [7] proved "continuous" versions of the Brascamp-Lieb and the reverse Brascamp-Lieb inequalities that work for any isotropic measure µ on S n−1 (see (12) and (13) below). Here we only consider the case in which all non-negative real functions involved coincide with a "nice" probability density function, which is the common case in geometric applications.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of the Brascamp-lieb And The Reverse Brascampmentioning
confidence: 99%