1962
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3697(62)90053-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductivity in iron oxides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…:7, m FeO ðrÞ¼ 0:2, d is the skin depth [10][11][12]. This indicates that the ohmic loss will be higher in the wustite phase (FeO¼Feþ1/2O 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…:7, m FeO ðrÞ¼ 0:2, d is the skin depth [10][11][12]. This indicates that the ohmic loss will be higher in the wustite phase (FeO¼Feþ1/2O 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The amount of ferrous iron in relation to the total iron content in glauconite is usually in the range 10-20 per cent, but the ratio is also dependent on the redox conditions (McRae 1972;Fanning 1989). Iron oxides in the ferrous state (magnetite and wüstite) have high conductivity and can thus produce high IP effects (Bertin & Loeb 1976), while iron oxides in the ferric (oxidized) state (hematite) have lower conductivity values (Tannhauser 1962;Vella & Emerson 2012). It is known from the Härlöv core that glauconitic sand is present at different levels throughout the limestone.…”
Section: Microgeometrical Variations Of the Kristianstad Limestonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduced Fe 2 O 3 can cause the energy loss by the consumption of active materials and lower the conductivity of the entire ink and electrodes due to its low electrical conductivity and electrochemical performance [19,20]. According to these two reactions mentioned above, we could expect fewer impurities in sample D because of less consumption of protons and hydroxide ions compared with other samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%