2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00015-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditions and effects of example elaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it is essential that the learning tasks within the same task class show a high variability on all dimensions that also vary in the real world to reach transfer of learning (Paas & van Merriënboer, 1994;Quilici & Mayer, 1996;van Merriënboer, Schuurman, et al, 2002). As another example, asking questions about worked-out examples or completion tasks is important to ensure that learners elaborate them (see Stark, Mandl, Gruber, & Renkl, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is essential that the learning tasks within the same task class show a high variability on all dimensions that also vary in the real world to reach transfer of learning (Paas & van Merriënboer, 1994;Quilici & Mayer, 1996;van Merriënboer, Schuurman, et al, 2002). As another example, asking questions about worked-out examples or completion tasks is important to ensure that learners elaborate them (see Stark, Mandl, Gruber, & Renkl, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies present the questionnaire only after learning has taken place (for example, Ayres 2006a; Hasler et al 2007;Kalyuga et al 1999;Pociask and Morrison 2008;Tindall-Ford et al 1997), whereas other studies repeat the same questionnaire several times during (and sometimes also after) the learning process (for example, Kester et al 2006a;Paas et al 2007;Stark et al 2002;Tabbers et al 2004;van Merriënboer et al 2002). The more often cognitive load is measured the more accurate the view of the actual cognitive load is, certainly if it is assumed that cognitive load may vary during the learning process (Paas et al 2003b).…”
Section: Measuring Cognitive Load Through Self-reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the time that participants in the training conditions observed the models self-assess their performance and select new tasks (approximately 90s), participants in the control condition were asked to remember and restate what was explained in the modeling example by typing in (step-by-step) what should be done at each step (cf. Stark et al 2002).…”
Section: Training Phasementioning
confidence: 99%