1993
DOI: 10.1016/0163-1047(93)90159-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditioned defeat in the Syrian golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

5
73
1
9

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
73
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Resident hamsters normally display territorial aggression toward an intruding hamster placed into their cage; however, after repeated defeats, residents behave defensively and will flee from an intruder (3). A similar behavioral phenomenon has also been documented in invertebrates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Resident hamsters normally display territorial aggression toward an intruding hamster placed into their cage; however, after repeated defeats, residents behave defensively and will flee from an intruder (3). A similar behavioral phenomenon has also been documented in invertebrates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Defeated hamsters exhibit a pervasive subordinate social status even when they are later exposed to smaller, nonaggressive animals (Jasnow and Huhman 2001). Thus, this latter phenomenon is referred to as conditioned defeat (Potegal et al 1993;Jasnow and Huhman 2001). Despite the considerable utility of this model for studying both social stress and social anxiety, the neurochemical mechanism underlying both unconditioned and conditioned social defeat remains incompletely understood (see also Jasnow et al 1999Jasnow et al , 2005Jasnow and Huhman 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potegal and colleagues (Potegal, Huhman, Moore, and Meyerhoff, 1993) showed that after a single, prolonged bout of agonistic behavior, nearly 90% of defeated males displayed submissive postures when presented with a novel, non-aggressive stimulus male, an effect called conditioned defeat. Recently, it was shown that females do not show the same level of conditioned defeat (Huhman, Solomon, Janicki, Harmon, Lin, Israel, and Jasnow, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%