1996
DOI: 10.1017/s0001867800027257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional cyclic Markov random fields

Abstract: Grenander et al. (1991) proposed a conditional cyclic Gaussian Markov random field model for the edges of a closed outline in the plane. In this paper the model is recast as an improper cyclic Gaussian Markov random field for the vertices. The limiting behaviour of this model when the vertices become closely spaced is also described and in particular its relationship with the theory of ‘snakes' (Kass et al. 1987) is established. Applications are given in Grenander et al. (1991), Mardia et al. (1991) and Kent e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that in general a pth-order MRF model for the edge transformation vector corresponds to a ðp þ 1Þth-order MRF model for the vertex transformation vector. A similar result can be found in Kent et al (1996).…”
Section: Propositionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Note that in general a pth-order MRF model for the edge transformation vector corresponds to a ðp þ 1Þth-order MRF model for the vertex transformation vector. A similar result can be found in Kent et al (1996).…”
Section: Propositionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Of course this is an approximation, since there are generally continuous edges in the background as well as on the boundary of the target object. There have been some attempts to allow explicitly for this type of dependence | for example, the Markov discriminant of (MacCormick and Blake, 1998b), or MRFs in general (Chellappa and Jain, 1993Kent et al, 1996Winkler, 1995. However, these are too computationally expensive for tracking tasks, so instead we adopt the assumption of independence between measurement lines.…”
Section: Independence Of Measurement Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 1)where all indices are modulo the number of vertices n. The parameterisation in (1) is proposed by Kent, Mardia & Walder (1996), and a 0 and a 1 are interpreted as var(t (0) i j rest of t (0) ) = 1=C i;i and corr(t…”
Section: The High-level Image Model 1 a Deformable Template Model Formentioning
confidence: 99%