2002
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9469.00295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Relation between Edge and Vertex Modelling in Shape Analysis

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Objects in the plane with no obvious landmarks can be described by either vertex transformation vectors or edge transformation vectors. In this paper we provide the relation between the two transformation vectors. Grenander & Miller (1994) use a multivariate normal distribution with a block circulant covariance matrix to model the edge transformation vector. This type of model is also feasible for the vertex transformation vector and in certain cases the free parameters of the two models match up in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2011) for an application of shape analysis to fingerprints. In fact, entire polygons comprising ordered vertices, or being even star shaped as considered here, may be represented in a Euclidean space, rendering their analysis particularly simple (Hobolth et al. , 2002; Hotz et al.…”
Section: Discussion On the Paper By Neumann Evett And Skerrettmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2011) for an application of shape analysis to fingerprints. In fact, entire polygons comprising ordered vertices, or being even star shaped as considered here, may be represented in a Euclidean space, rendering their analysis particularly simple (Hobolth et al. , 2002; Hotz et al.…”
Section: Discussion On the Paper By Neumann Evett And Skerrettmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. We suppose that Y t is star-shaped with respect to a point z ∈ R 2 for all t. Then, the boundary of Y t can be determined by its radius vector function R t = {R t (θ ) : θ ∈ [0, 2π)} with respect to z, where Hobolth et al (2003), a deformable template model is introduced, describing a random planar object as a stochastic deformation of a known star-shaped template, see also the closely related models described in Hobolth and Jensen (2000), Kent et al (2000) and Hobolth et al (2002). We use this approach here and describe the object at time t + 1 as a stochastic transformation of the object at time t, such that…”
Section: The Gaussian Radial Growth Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is called p-order because it can be derived as a limit of discrete p-order Markov models defined on a finite, systematic set of angles θ , cf. Hobolth et al (2002).…”
Section: The Fourier Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by placing the main vein of the leaf tangentially to the positive vertical axis as described above, we can immediately use the spherical representation X Å −1 X Å in S k m . Alternatively, we might consider the vertex transformation vectors of Hobolth et al (2002). They viewed planar star-shaped objects with k landmarks as deformations of a regular k-sided polygon.…”
Section: Shapes Of Poplar Leavesmentioning
confidence: 99%