2016
DOI: 10.5840/eps201650470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional attitude ascription

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Take ( 6), where we can report Mary believes Sue is Catholic (6a) by virtue of Mary believing that Sue and John are of the same denomination, and the reporter believing that John is Catholic. If Mary believes Sue and John are Protestant, that report suddenly seems infelicitous (Tiskin 2016). Yet in this modified context, the reporter still knows John is Catholic and that Mary thinks John and Sue are of the same denomination, so R as in (28) should still generate a reading of (6a) equivalent to (6b), read de dicto.…”
Section: At-issue-nessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Take ( 6), where we can report Mary believes Sue is Catholic (6a) by virtue of Mary believing that Sue and John are of the same denomination, and the reporter believing that John is Catholic. If Mary believes Sue and John are Protestant, that report suddenly seems infelicitous (Tiskin 2016). Yet in this modified context, the reporter still knows John is Catholic and that Mary thinks John and Sue are of the same denomination, so R as in (28) should still generate a reading of (6a) equivalent to (6b), read de dicto.…”
Section: At-issue-nessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 One exception is B&L 2021, which we briefly discuss in section 5.4. Two others areBaron 2015 andTiskin 2016, which unify problems #1-3 (double-vision, empty-extension third readings, and de re predicates), but either over-or under-generate some revisionist reports.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В последние десятилетия вышел целый ряд публикаций, посвященных «нестандартным» интерпретациям de re, то есть таким, в которых res является не индивид, а свойство или пропозиция (как в том варианте интерпретации примера (2), где Маша не знала, что главой японского государства является император). Авторы некоторых из этих публикаций обращали внимание на тот факт, что загадка таких интерпретаций разрешается, если отказаться от дихотомии «de dicto -de re» и считать, что эти интерпретации отличаются от обычных de dicto не семантически, а прагматически ( (Schwager, 2009;Sudo, 2014;Tiskin, 2016;Blumberg, Lederman 2021), не считая более ранних упоминаний сходных идей, таких как (van Fraassen 1979; Parikh 1998)). Эти публикации на разный лад предполагают, что нормы коммуникации позволяют иногда использовать вместо истинного высказывания об установке de dicto другое высказывание об установке de dicto.…”
Section: De Re и знакомствоunclassified
“…Alternative theories have been formulated in terms of evaluating a property in the metaphysically closest worlds where the property is not empty (Schwager, 2011), substitution of contextually equivalent functions (Sudo, 2014), generalized concept generators (Baron, 2015), and a pragmatic account that assumes a modification of the context set of the conversation (Tiskin, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%