2003
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual signal in the field cricket Gryllus campestris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
123
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
123
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is often assumed; it would be better if it were demonstrated (e.g. Kotiaho 2002;Scheuber et al 2003a).…”
Section: (A) General Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is often assumed; it would be better if it were demonstrated (e.g. Kotiaho 2002;Scheuber et al 2003a).…”
Section: (A) General Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cervus elaphus Horn length shows sigmoidal allometry unlike other traits which is interpreted as elevated condition dependence, but horns are thought to be weapons rather than sexual ornaments (Kotiaho 2002), and under frequency-dependent rather than sexual selection (Moczek & Emlen 2000 Scheuber et al (2003a) experimentally investigated the condition dependence of calling song in Gryllus campestris. They found that the frequency of calling and the chirp rate declined as adult dietary stress increased.…”
Section: (B) Cricketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently proposed that the calling song of male field crickets Gryllus campestris is a multicomponent sexual signal, in which two key components, chirp rate and carrier frequency (pitch), reflect condition during different stages of life (Scheuber et al 2003). The calling song is the main acoustic sexual display in crickets and female mate-choice decisions may involve both chirp rate (Wagner et al 2001) and carrier frequency (Simmons & Ritchie 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in other species of crickets have shown that body condition affects calling song (Wagner & Hoback 1999;Holzer et al 2003;Scheuber et al 2003), and in some cases, affects female choice (Wagner & Hoback 1999;Holzer et al 2003). In contrast, body condition in G. texensis does not affect courtship song, which is quieter than calling song and directly precedes mating (Gray & Eckhardt 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…First, calling in crickets is energetically costly, requiring up to 16 times basal metabolic rates for some trilling species (Prestwich & Walker 1981;Hoback & Wagner 1997). Second, some components of cricket song are condition dependent in other species of crickets (Wagner & Hoback 1999;Scheuber et al 2003). Third, food limitation and condition dependence of song elements occur in some cricket populations under natural conditions (Holzer et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%