2020
DOI: 10.1177/0363546520937291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concussion Symptom Cutoffs for Identification and Prognosis of Sports-Related Concussion: Role of Time Since Injury

Abstract: Background: Symptom reporting with scales such as the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) is one of the most sensitive markers of concussed status and/or recovery time, It is known that time from injury until initial clinic visit affects symptom presentation and recovery outcomes, but no study to date has evaluated changes in clinical cutoff scores for the PCSS based on earlier versus later clinical presentation postconcussion. Purpose: To evaluate if time since injury after sports-related concussion (SRC) af… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the literature in this area, however, has investigated the PCSS Total Symptom score and different symptom domains’ utility in predicting prolonged recovery. Overall, it appears that acute symptom burden and increased symptom-reporting at initial assessment are predictive of prolonged recovery (Iverson et al, 2017; Meehan et al, 2014, 2016; Schilling et al, 2020), with several authors offering varying numerical cutoffs for different symptom domains (Eagle, Womble, et al, 2020; Lau et al, 2011, 2012). Even still, several other noncognitive/symptom factors have been associated with increased risk for and prediction of prolonged recovery status, including premorbid personal or family psychiatric history, onset of depression and/or headaches following injury, mechanism of injury (e.g., car accident vs. sport concussion), time to initial clinic visit, genetic risk status (e.g., APOE ε4), and delayed removal from play (Asken et al, 2016, 2018; Eagle, Puligilla, et al, 2020; Iverson et al, 2017; Merritt & Arnett, 2016; Merritt et al, 2016; Morgan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the literature in this area, however, has investigated the PCSS Total Symptom score and different symptom domains’ utility in predicting prolonged recovery. Overall, it appears that acute symptom burden and increased symptom-reporting at initial assessment are predictive of prolonged recovery (Iverson et al, 2017; Meehan et al, 2014, 2016; Schilling et al, 2020), with several authors offering varying numerical cutoffs for different symptom domains (Eagle, Womble, et al, 2020; Lau et al, 2011, 2012). Even still, several other noncognitive/symptom factors have been associated with increased risk for and prediction of prolonged recovery status, including premorbid personal or family psychiatric history, onset of depression and/or headaches following injury, mechanism of injury (e.g., car accident vs. sport concussion), time to initial clinic visit, genetic risk status (e.g., APOE ε4), and delayed removal from play (Asken et al, 2016, 2018; Eagle, Puligilla, et al, 2020; Iverson et al, 2017; Merritt & Arnett, 2016; Merritt et al, 2016; Morgan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This delayed presentation is concerning, as it has been reported to be associated with longer recovery times and more pronounced symptoms and impairment. 7,8,10,11 Patients with concussion during the pandemic were 2 years older on average and less likely to be <18 years old. These results may reflect the drop in SRCs, which typically affect younger patients, during the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Receiver operator curve analyses were performed to calculate the diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]) of each Child SCAT5 score [21,24,25,[55][56][57][58]]. Youden's Index (J) [59] was calculated to determine the cutoff score that optimized the combination of sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) for each Child SCAT5 score [60][61][62][63]. Values closer to 1.0 for the Youden Index are indicative of a greater combination of sensitivity and specificity [59].…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%