2017
DOI: 10.1080/17518423.2017.1323974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale to detect delayed gross motor development in preterm infants: A comparative study with the Bayley III

Abstract: AIMS proved very capable of detecting delayed gross motor development in preterm infants when compared with the Bayley-III/GM. The 10th percentile of AIMS provided the best combination of indicators, with greater specificity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…At 4 months of age, an individualized motor intervention programme was established if needed. Each programme was based on the severity of the impairment as appreciated using the AIMSa score below the 10 th percentile rank being considered as a high-risk score for motor delay - 19,20 and the physical therapists' observations. If needed, infants received early physical therapy at our neurocardiac clinic before they were referred to their regional paediatric centre at the age of 8 months at the earliest.…”
Section: Gross Motor Evaluations and Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 4 months of age, an individualized motor intervention programme was established if needed. Each programme was based on the severity of the impairment as appreciated using the AIMSa score below the 10 th percentile rank being considered as a high-risk score for motor delay - 19,20 and the physical therapists' observations. If needed, infants received early physical therapy at our neurocardiac clinic before they were referred to their regional paediatric centre at the age of 8 months at the earliest.…”
Section: Gross Motor Evaluations and Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concurrent validity of the Bayley-III and AIMS has recently been reported in preterm infants and children with risk at or with a developmental delay, but no studies are yet available in typically developing children [4,5]. Concurrent validity of the Bayley-III-NL is described in the manual, but also for this version no comparison has been made yet with another motor test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ao término da avaliação, cada critério observado no repertório das habilidades motoras recebeu escore 01 (um) e cada critério motor não observado recebeu escore 0 (zero). Assim, os itens observados em cada uma das posições foram somados, resultando em quatro subtotais cujo escore total resultou da soma desses valores, o que permitiu determinar o percentil motor da AIMS em correspondência com o escore da idade corrigida, de acordo com o gráfi co de classifi cação da AIMS [14][15][16] .…”
Section: Materiais E Métodosunclassified