2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2021.120255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent estimation of some co-administered antimicrobial drugs applying conventional and first derivative synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluating the validation parameters of the proposed method with regard to the reference methods [41,42] reflected comparable accuracy and linearity, as reflected from recovery percentages and R 2 values respectively (table 4). Meanwhile, the proposed method was superior to the reference methods offering wider linearity ranges for both drugs (table 4), permitting expansion of its application scope.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Evaluating the validation parameters of the proposed method with regard to the reference methods [41,42] reflected comparable accuracy and linearity, as reflected from recovery percentages and R 2 values respectively (table 4). Meanwhile, the proposed method was superior to the reference methods offering wider linearity ranges for both drugs (table 4), permitting expansion of its application scope.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Through the application of the suggested analytical method to the analytes, and comparing the obtained results with those of a well-characterized assay, the accuracy is evaluated by judging the nearness of the results of both methods [22]. Different concentrations of CIP and LEV were assayed by the proposed method over their linearity ranges, and the obtained data were then compared with those of the reported methods [41,42]. The adequate closeness between both methods was recoded as implemented from the Students' t test and variance ratio F test [43], in addition to the resultant high recovery percentages (table 2) proving the accuracy of the proposed method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations