2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2022.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent elimination of arsenic and hydrated silica from natural groundwater by electrocoagulation using iron electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also performed XRD analysis to characterize the solid phases of the residues for Sample 1 and Sample 2 after electrocoagulation with an iron electrode (Figure 6). As shown in Figure 6A, for the solid residue of Sample 1, diffraction lines associated with spinelloid, Mg 2 SiO 4 (31.02°, 34.75°, 35.18°, 37.83°, 37.92°, 38.58°, 41.23°, 42.73° 2θ), magnetite (41.38°, 43.31°, 50.44°, 57.44° 2θ), iron sodium oxide, FeNaO 2 (39.27°, 40.58°, 42.21° 2θ), scorodite, FeAsO 4 ⋅ 2H 2 O (19.78°, 25.58°, 26.85°, 32.54°, 35.34° 2θ), ferrihydrite, Fe 2 O 3 ⋅ 0.5H 2 O (19.62°, 30.41°, 35.13, 40.79° 2θ), [39,40] fayalite, Fe 2 SiO 4 (29.16°, 36.90°, 39.75°, 40.84°, 41.96°, 43.59° 2θ) [40] calcite, CaCO 3 (34.27°, 46.10°, 50.56° 2θ) and brownmillerite, Ca 2 Fe 2 O 5 (26.55°, 28.01°, 34.06°, 37.35°, 39.27°, 38.58° 2θ) were detected. For Sample 2, in addition to the minerals mentioned above, including spinelloid, magnetite, ferrihydrite, fayalite, and scorodite (15.3°, 27.99°, 33.05° 2θ), the goethite, FeOOH (34.8°, 42.73°, 50.56° 2θ) was identified as well (Figure 6B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also performed XRD analysis to characterize the solid phases of the residues for Sample 1 and Sample 2 after electrocoagulation with an iron electrode (Figure 6). As shown in Figure 6A, for the solid residue of Sample 1, diffraction lines associated with spinelloid, Mg 2 SiO 4 (31.02°, 34.75°, 35.18°, 37.83°, 37.92°, 38.58°, 41.23°, 42.73° 2θ), magnetite (41.38°, 43.31°, 50.44°, 57.44° 2θ), iron sodium oxide, FeNaO 2 (39.27°, 40.58°, 42.21° 2θ), scorodite, FeAsO 4 ⋅ 2H 2 O (19.78°, 25.58°, 26.85°, 32.54°, 35.34° 2θ), ferrihydrite, Fe 2 O 3 ⋅ 0.5H 2 O (19.62°, 30.41°, 35.13, 40.79° 2θ), [39,40] fayalite, Fe 2 SiO 4 (29.16°, 36.90°, 39.75°, 40.84°, 41.96°, 43.59° 2θ) [40] calcite, CaCO 3 (34.27°, 46.10°, 50.56° 2θ) and brownmillerite, Ca 2 Fe 2 O 5 (26.55°, 28.01°, 34.06°, 37.35°, 39.27°, 38.58° 2θ) were detected. For Sample 2, in addition to the minerals mentioned above, including spinelloid, magnetite, ferrihydrite, fayalite, and scorodite (15.3°, 27.99°, 33.05° 2θ), the goethite, FeOOH (34.8°, 42.73°, 50.56° 2θ) was identified as well (Figure 6B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also performed XRD analysis to characterize the solid phases of the residues for Sample 1 and Sample 2 after electrocoagulation with an iron electrode (Figure 6). As shown in Figure 6A, for the solid residue of Sample [39,40] fayalite, Fe 2 SiO 4 (29.16°, 36.90°, 39.75°, 40.84°, 41.96°, 43.59°2θ) [40] calcite, CaCO 3 (34.27°, 46.10°, 50.56°2θ) and brownmillerite, Ca 2 Fe 2 O 5 (26.55°, 28.01°, 34.06°, 37.35°, 39.27°, 38.58°2θ) were detected. For Sample 2, in addition to the minerals mentioned above, including spinelloid, magnetite, ferrihydrite, fayalite, and scorodite (15.3°, 27.99°, 33.05°2θ), the goethite, FeOOH (34.8°, 42.73°, 50.56°2 θ) was identified as well (Figure 6B).…”
Section: Real Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%