1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19991015)86:8<1406::aid-cncr4>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma patients with malignant fistulae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…enables restoration of the perforated mucosa and connective tissues, and it therefore seems that treatment for the cause of the fistula should come before protection of the fistula. This theory is supported by the course of the present case and the course of a previously reported case [7] .…”
Section: Possibility Of Closure Of a Fistulasupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…enables restoration of the perforated mucosa and connective tissues, and it therefore seems that treatment for the cause of the fistula should come before protection of the fistula. This theory is supported by the course of the present case and the course of a previously reported case [7] .…”
Section: Possibility Of Closure Of a Fistulasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Propriety o�� treatment ��or esophageal malignancy with a fistula It has been reported that continuing and completing a course of treatment for malignancy seems to be better than suspending treatment even if a malignant fistula appears in the course of treatment [1,2,7] . However, there has been no report on the size limit of a treatable fistula and the propriety of treatment with the presence of a giant fistula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, there have been reports that radiotherapy and chemotherapy contributed to fistula closure and improved patient survival. 7,8 Burstow et al 9 reported that patients (n 5 23) receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, in addition to stenting, survived significantly longer than those (n 5 67) who received a stent alone (mean survival, 152.8 days versus 71.8 days). In the present cases, stent placement could not be performed because of severe esophageal stenosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two had their chemoradiotherapy interrupted because of pneumonia. One of the 2 received additional chemotherapy after successful treatment of pneumonia: the other died of perforation of the aorta [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%