1980
DOI: 10.1093/geronj/35.2.232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent Change in Planned and Preferred Age for Retirement

Abstract: Studies of older workers' readiness to retire have reported a growing trend toward plans or expectations for earlier retirement. At the same time, other studies have shown that as workers age they prefer progressively later ages for retirement. To clarify the relationship between planned and preferred age for retirement, concurrent trends in the two measures for a single sample of male workers were compared. At two sampling times 10 years apart, a panel of 912 workers (aged 45 to 74 at T2) was asked at what ag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We calculated the difference between planned retirement age (reported when still working) and actual retirement age. Planned retirement age when measured appears to be relatively stable, with one study showing 92% consistency year to year (Midanik, Soghikian, Ransom, & Polen, 1990) and when the planned age shifts, it tends to be in the direction of later retirement rather than earlier retirement (Ekerdt, Bosse, & Mogey, 1980). A short 2-year window between consecutive surveys identified earlier retirement than planned retirement to minimize the non-job related factors affecting altered expectations.…”
Section: Earlier Than Planned Retirementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the difference between planned retirement age (reported when still working) and actual retirement age. Planned retirement age when measured appears to be relatively stable, with one study showing 92% consistency year to year (Midanik, Soghikian, Ransom, & Polen, 1990) and when the planned age shifts, it tends to be in the direction of later retirement rather than earlier retirement (Ekerdt, Bosse, & Mogey, 1980). A short 2-year window between consecutive surveys identified earlier retirement than planned retirement to minimize the non-job related factors affecting altered expectations.…”
Section: Earlier Than Planned Retirementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of an individual's planned retirement age decision both types of goals are likely to be salient (Taylor & Shore, 1995). Even though most individuals prefer to retire sooner, they often do not expect to be able to afford to retire at their preferred age (Ekerdt, Bossé, & Mogey, 1980;Esser, 2006;Zappalà et al, 2008). This suggests that in retirement age planning one's desirable retirement age is generally tempered by financial feasibility concerns.…”
Section: Planned Retirement Age: a Tension Between Desirability And Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intended retirement age is identified as the focal retirement intentions measure because it best indicates the probable onset of retirement. It is also the preferred retirement orientation measure because of its behavioural nature and because longitudinal studies report that retirement attitudes are revised to converge with plans by individuals as they near retirement (Ekerdt, Bosse and Mogey, 1980).…”
Section: Attitude Toward Retirementmentioning
confidence: 99%