2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concrete spatial language: See what I mean?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
73
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
8
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…99-103). It seems that the results obtained in psycholinguistic experiments (Matlock, 2004b(Matlock, , 2006Matlock & Richardson, 2004;Richardson & Matlock, 2007), and brain studies (Wallentin et al, 2005;Saygin et al, 2010;Cacciari et al, 2011) demonstrate the fictive mode, in which processing of fictive motion takes place in a manner somewhat parallel to actual motion. This mode has arguably a greater potential for denoting spatial extension in terms of duration, since it evokes an association with physical movement.…”
Section: Fictive and Factive Processing Of Coextension Pathsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…99-103). It seems that the results obtained in psycholinguistic experiments (Matlock, 2004b(Matlock, , 2006Matlock & Richardson, 2004;Richardson & Matlock, 2007), and brain studies (Wallentin et al, 2005;Saygin et al, 2010;Cacciari et al, 2011) demonstrate the fictive mode, in which processing of fictive motion takes place in a manner somewhat parallel to actual motion. This mode has arguably a greater potential for denoting spatial extension in terms of duration, since it evokes an association with physical movement.…”
Section: Fictive and Factive Processing Of Coextension Pathsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Wallentin et al (2005) found that fictive motion sentences activate the left posterior middle temporal cortex, which is the brain area responsible for visual processing of complex action knowledge. It is sensitive, for example, to visual perception of motion implied by still pictures or mental navigation.…”
Section: Fictive Motion As a Cognitive Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processing of abstract words has been associated with greater activation in areas such as the middle and superior temporal gyrus and the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), which are thought to be involved in semantic processing (Pexman, Hargreaves, Edwards, Henry, & Goodyear, 2007;Fliessbach, Weis, Klaver, Elger, & Weber, 2006;Binder, Westbury, McKiernan, Possing, & Medler, 2005;Sabsevitz, Medler, Seidenberg, & Binder, 2005;Wallentin, Ostergaard, Lund, Ostergaard, & Roepstorff, 2005;Fiebach & Friederici, 2004;Noppeney & Price, 2004;Whatmough, Verret, Fung, & Chertkow, 2004;Grossman et al, 2002;Friederici, Opitz, & von Cramon, 2000;Jessen et al, 2000;Wise et al, 2000;Kiehl et al, 1999;Perani et al, 1999;Mellet, Tzourio, Denis, & Mazoyer, 1998). By contrast, concrete words show greater activity in regions associated with higher levels of visual processing, such as the ventral anterior part of the fusiform gyrus (Bedny & Thompson-Schill, 2006;Fliessbach et al, 2006;Sabsevitz et al, 2005;Wallentin et al, 2005;Fiebach & Friederici, 2004;Giesbrecht, Camblin, & Swaab, 2004;Whatmough et al, 2004;Wise et al, 2000;Mellet et al, 1998;D'Esposito et al, 1997;Fletcher et al, 1995). However, other studies have failed to find greater activations for concrete words in these areas (e.g., Binder et al, 2005;Jessen et al, 2000) or in any other brain regions (Noppeney & Price, 2004;Friederici et al, 2000;Kiehl et al, 1999;…”
Section: Behavioral Neuropsychological and Neuroimaging Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…'the man goes into the house') to abstract (e.g. 'the man goes into politics') radically shifts the contrastive brain activation from a typical bilateral posterior temporoparietal 'spatial navigation' pattern to a typical 'language-like' left-lateralized inferior-frontal pattern ( Wallentin et al 2005b).…”
Section: Words and Sentences In The Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%