Concordância entre avaliadores na seleção de artigos em revisões sistemáticas

Oliveira, Natália Sanchez; Oliveira, Julicristie Machado de; Bergamaschi, Denise Pimentel

doi:10.1590/s1415-790x2006000300005

Cited by 11 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 9 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The rate of agreement in article selection for systematic reviews is an important methodological aspect. Few studies discuss the agreement between evaluators in the initial steps of article selection (Oliveira, Oliveira, & Bergamaschi, 2006;Giannakopoulos, Rammelsberg, Eberhard, & Schmitter, 2012). Crossed evaluations by two specialists are hard to accomplish, due to the large amount of time required.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Quality of Scientific Articles from Latin America and Other Regions

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes a study comparing articles from Latin America and other regions, to assess the quality of both methodology and results presentation. These articles were included in a systematic review about the prevalence of postpartum depression. The study is of the documentary research type with critical analysis of the literature. Two independent reviewers performed the critical analysis of the studies. The quality of the articles was measured according to the Loney Scale. Statistical analysis was applied and the hypotheses were tested through the usage of non-parametric tests. Thirty-four Latin American studies were identified, evaluated, and compared to a random sample of thirty-four articles from other regions. The quality of the methodology and results of the two groups of articles did not show a significant difference. In both cases, quality was found to be low. Scientific articles are evidences that can support decision-making both in the clinical practice and in public policymaking. For authors to generate scientific articles of quality that are reliable evidence is necessary to build the capability of researchers in developing rigorous methodologies to generate consistent results.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Quality of Scientific Articles from Latin America and Other Regions

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Agreement studies are carried out by several areas of knowledge whose objective is to make the results of a given topic analyzed present minimal credibility in scienti c terms since the greater the agreement between peers, the more reliable the result of the object in question (Silva & Paes, 2012; A. C. de Souza et al, 2017). However, it is observed that few documents in the literature assess the agreement between evaluators in the initial selection of articles (N. S. Oliveira et al, 2006). This fact may compromise the research results, in addition to indicating less methodological rigor.…”

Section: Data Gathering Screening Research Ndings and Delimitationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-purpose biorefineries and their social impacts: A systematic literature review

Santos

Ianda

Carvalho

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-product biorefineries are very promising industries to diversify the economy of countries since they have a productive matrix with a biological characteristic capable of processing various types of biomass with applications in pharmaceutical, renewable energy, and other industries. In this context, this research carries out an analysis of the literature on biorefineries and the methods of assessing social impacts that consider quality of life, employment, and stakeholders, among other metrics, as guided by the United Nations – UN. A systematic review combined with bibliometric, semantic, and content analysis was carried out by searching scientific documents in the Scopus and Web of Science databases. A total of 116 articles were located, of which twenty-three were selected by three researchers to compose the research. The Fleiss Kappa Index was applied to verify the agreement of the evaluators' decision regarding the inclusion and exclusion of articles, they obtained K = 0.43 above the tolerable limit defined for the inclusion of articles, which is K ≥ 0.21Therefore, all twenty-three articles were included. The results indicate that most biorefinery projects consider optimization and econometric methods and especially the employment metric, therefore, understood as insufficient for assessing social impacts. On the other hand, projects whose methods consider Social Life Cycle and Multicriteria are more consistent for assessing the social impacts of biorefineries, as they allow an analysis of qualitative and significant information.

show abstract

“…Há poucos estudos na literatura que avaliam a concordância entre avaliadores na seleção inicial de artigos. (Oliveira, Oliveira, & Bergamaschi, 2006 (Rodrigues, 2008;Ryder, 2001 Volpato (2007Volpato ( , 2009Volpato ( , 2010aVolpato ( , 2010bVolpato ( , 2011Volpato ( , 2013, Sabadini et al (2009a) Avaliamos todos os artigos latino-americanos incluídos na revisão e pareamos a amostra de comparação. A amostra aleatória é a que permite maiores generalizações, seguida das amostras estratificadas, sistemática e de grupo (Lay & Reis, 2005).…”

Section: Diminuindo Os Vieses De Seleção: Concordância Entre Avaliadorasunclassified

Qualidade de artigos incluídos em revisão sistemática: comparação entre latino-americanos e de outras regiões

Sampaio¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Muitas pessoas contribuíram para que essa etapa dos meus estudos fosse concluída, agradeço a cada uma, sensibilizada. Morrendo de medo de ser injusta, vou agradecer especialmente a algumas pessoas e algumas instituições aqui. Quem se sentir injustiçado, por favor, desculpe-me, foi falha mesmo, nada intencional. À Profa. Dra. Sonia Beatriz Meyer, minha orientadora, que me adotou e foi competente, envolvida e carinhosa, meu muito obrigada, do fundo do coração.À Gabriela Andrade da Silva, autora da tese irmã, como disse a Sonia. Obrigada por surgir e remodelar meu estudo. Já sinto saudades dos nossos cafés, reunião por Skype à noite, e-mails... Ainda bem que temos projetos futuros juntas. Ainda bem! À Aparecida Angélica Paulovic Z. Sabadini, amiga, parceira de tantos projetos, bibliotecária exemplar, obrigada pela revisão cuidadosa das referências, leitura atenta de parte do texto e por ficar comigo até o último minuto.Aos membros da banca de defesa, que compartilharam comigo um momento único e especial da minha vida acadêmica e promoveram um debate rico e instrutivo, além de fornecerem contribuições excelentes para a versão revisada deste trabalho. Zabalza Sampaio e Janaína Cipriano. Duas moças lindas e queridas.À minha irmã e meus irmãos, cunhado, cunhadas e sobrinhos pelo carinho e por estarem sempre presentes em minha vida.À USP, ao IPUSP e aos seus funcionários, meus colegas, professores e alunos. Ao Departamento de Psicologia Experimental do Instituto de Psicologia daUniversidade de São Paulo por me receber com tanto carinho e pelo apoio financeiro para obtenção de artigos por comutação bibliográfica.Aos editores e autores que me trouxeram a inquietação para fazer este estudo. Introduction: The quality of an article is directly proportional to the methodological quality and to the presentation of its associated research results. Questions or hypothesis well explained, clearly defined objectives, proposed objectives supported by an adequate methodology -based on sufficiently described and justified rigorous methodological procedures -are all essential elements in the correct presentation of research findings. Objective: Assess the quality of both the methodology and results presentation on articles about postpartum depression, included in systematic review, contrasting Latin-American with foreign articles. Method: The study is of the documentary research type with critical literary analysis. Two independent reviewers performed the definition of the data sources, definition of the search criteria, classification of the studies according to the selection criteria and data analysis. The quality of the articles was measured according to the Loney Scale in comparing the performance of Latin-American and foreign articles and the location of the respective publishing journals. Titles, summaries and keywords were also evaluated in terms of international normative references and field specific terminologies. Technical statistics were applied and the hypothesis tested through the usage of nonparametric tests. Results: ...

show abstract

Concordância entre avaliadores na seleção de artigos em revisões sistemáticas

Cited by 11 publications

References 9 publications

Comparison of Quality of Scientific Articles from Latin America and Other Regions

Comparison of Quality of Scientific Articles from Latin America and Other Regions

Multi-purpose biorefineries and their social impacts: A systematic literature review

Qualidade de artigos incluídos em revisão sistemática: comparação entre latino-americanos e de outras regiões

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About