2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concordance Between Self-Report and a Survey-Based Algorithm for Classification of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Using the 2011 Population-Based Survey on Living With Chronic Diseases in Canada (SLCDC)-Diabetes Component

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, because self-reported cases of unknown type were reclassified as type 2 diabetes, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes might have been overestimated. However, according to a Canadian survey-based algorithm to distinguish diabetes types, 99% of adults who self-reported unknown type would have been classified as type 2 diabetes ( 7 ). Finally, the small sample size of some subgroups limited precision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, because self-reported cases of unknown type were reclassified as type 2 diabetes, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes might have been overestimated. However, according to a Canadian survey-based algorithm to distinguish diabetes types, 99% of adults who self-reported unknown type would have been classified as type 2 diabetes ( 7 ). Finally, the small sample size of some subgroups limited precision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtually all patients with type 1 diabetes require insulin to survive, and very few persons who use insulin do not report using it ( 5 ). Previous studies have found that self-reported diabetes type alone is not a valid method for classifying diabetes type in surveys because some patients are not aware of their diabetes type ( 5 , 7 ). Therefore, for this analysis, type 1 diabetes was defined as current insulin use and self-report of type 1 diabetes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We only included 2323 respondents who self-reported type 2 diabetes, based on the Ng, Dasgupta and Johnson (NDJ) classification algorithm. 23 Respondents with any missing values from any variables were excluded from our analysis.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the benefit of subtyping is the examination of the individuality of condition. Subtyping type one diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type two diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the populace concentrates achievable utilizing as often as possible accessible clinical data [4,5] A few investigations have revealed. The populace pervasiveness of different types of diabetes, for example, monogenic diabetes [6,7] and diabetes because of pancreatic infection [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group Health recommends avoiding the term pre-diabetes because not all patients with IGT and IFG will develop diabetes 3. Fasting is defined as no calorie intake for at least 8 h 4. The examination should be conducted as reported by the WHO using a glucose load-receiving the equivalent to 75 g of anhydrous glucose dissolved in water.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%