Informal Nationalism After Communism 2018
DOI: 10.5040/9781350986824.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conclusion: When Post-Socialism Meets The Everyday

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been argued that both groups, Estonians and Russians, think that their consumer behavior is common among Estonian citizens (Polese and Seliverstova 2017). Both communities seem to convey a message that they are behaving according to what they perceive being "national standards" or "respecting national values."…”
Section: Invisible Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been argued that both groups, Estonians and Russians, think that their consumer behavior is common among Estonian citizens (Polese and Seliverstova 2017). Both communities seem to convey a message that they are behaving according to what they perceive being "national standards" or "respecting national values."…”
Section: Invisible Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Although the study of supermarket items has directly informed two distinct articles (Polese et al, 2017a(Polese et al, , 2018, the reflection prompted has helped us to formulate the main argument of this article. 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some efforts exist, with Lenin Street’s renaming a prime example, their reach is restricted in large part by intertwined economic and political dependency as well as historic memory viewing Soviet “internationalism” favorably as contrasted with Moldovan nationalism of the 1990s (Kosienkowski 2017b, 127–128). While the category of Gagauzian is drawn upon and invested with groupness by ethnopolitical entrepreneurs, at the governmental level, policy remains pluralistic, thereby contrasting with general nation-building trends throughout the post-Soviet region during the last few decades (Smith et al 1998; Suny and Kennedy 1999; Polese et al 2018). Further, these cases illustrating intersectional and local experiences of belonging offer a critique “methodological nationalism” (Wimmer and Glick Schiller 2003), particularly within the growing body of literature on Gagauzian studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interplay of the construction of exclusionary national narratives and economic (inter) dependence shows that the institutionalization of nation building in Gagauzia is, to a great extent, ultimately restrained by economic realities. Along with contributing to the body of Gagauzian studies (Katchanovski 2005;Keough 2006;Demirdirek 2008;Kapaló 2011;Kvilinkova 2013;Cantir 2015;Tudoroiu 2016;Kosienkowski 2017aKosienkowski , 2017bGrigoriadis and Shahin 2021), I contribute to discussions on contemporary processes of nation building in postsocialist regions (Smith et al 1998;Suny and Kennedy 1999a;Polese and Isaacs 2016;Polese et al 2018), particularly to what extent it is a top-down process or involves elite participation. Bringing to light ethnographic data on intersectional and local experiences of belonging, I also aim to counter "methodological nationalism" (Wimmer and Glick Schiller 2003) both generally and in Gagauzian studies in particular.…”
Section: Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%