Conciseness, Financial Disclosure, and Market Reaction: A Textual Analysis of Annual Reports in Listed Chinese Companies

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the conciseness and complexity of financial disclosures and market reactions, using the annual reports of Chinese-listed B-share companies over the period 2006–2018. We employed a set of statistical methods that were derived from other fields, such as computational and event studies, in order to derive the English annual reports of Chinese-listed companies, as well as to obtain other key financial indicators from the CSMAR database. Markets react significantly to increased report length, which means that managers that present poor returns with manipulated financial reports could be hiding poor returns. Additionally, the findings of this study are robust to additional tests that use alternative proxies. Furthermore, the results of this paper reinforce the hypothesis that the readability of financial reports affects financial market response. The results indicate that more complex financial reports are correlated with lower current returns, and negatively affect the expectations of future returns. For the purposes of avoiding the effects of the coronavirus pandemic on the results, we utilized data up to 2018. In light of this circumstance, we recommend that future research be conducted that compares results from before and after the coronavirus pandemic. The findings of our study have important implications for regulators, managers, and investors. Investors should obtain relevant information through annual reports; therefore, the importance of style is less relevant. Managers should be encouraged to write their annual reports more concisely. This study concluded that these reports are significant outputs of firms, and are widely read by investors. The study also provides empirical evidence of market reactions that are associated with readability and earnings, as well as with surprise earnings; thus, the complexity of annual reports provided by a variety of investors, using computational and event analysis, should be reduced.

Examining the Impact of Corporate Governance on Investors and Investee Companies: Evidence from Yemen

“…The process of disclosing financial information is important in reducing the cost of capital and ensuring its continuity in business performance (Alduais 2016(Alduais , 2019Alduais et al 2022b), as CG contributes to attracting foreign and local investments and helps reduce capital flight and combat financial and administrative corruption (Alasbahi 2021;Alduais et al 2022a). Good corporate governance increases disclosure and transparency and provides financial information that helps improve performance and diversify corporate investments, which increases rates of return on investments (Larcker et al 2007).…”

Determinants of Firm Profitability: Empirical Evidence From Jordan’s Service Sector

“…An increase in firm size provides opportunities for greater profitability (Orser et al, 2000;Alduais et al, 2022b). Yazdanfar (2013) discovered that there firm size has an impact on profitability, based on micro-firms operating within the industrial sector in Sweden.…”

How Shareholders' Right of Speech Affects the Performance of Green Innovation--Big Data Practice Based on R Language Brucer Package

“…The smaller the equity concentration of the company, the lower the noise of the relevant variables used in the internal contract, and the more accurate and reliable they are, the more they will provide good incentive and supervision signals to the board of directors and senior management, so as to improve the growth of the enterprise [7] . Effective internal control can improve the accuracy of internal management reports or internal data information by reducing unintentional accounting errors or intentional accounting manipulation, inhibit the earnings management problems of the company, and enhance the competitive advantage of the enterprise [8] . One of the functions of low equity concentration is to supervise and feedback organizational activities.…”