Objective: In the internal governance of enterprises, the impact of shareholders' voice on the performance of green innovation is worth empirical research. Process: This paper takes a large number of data of listed companies from 2010 to 2020 as the research object, uses 28940 data, uses R studio environment to build a time fixed effect model, and uses OLS and other methods to the relationship between shareholder voice and corporate green innovation performance. Conclusion: The improvement of shareholders' discourse power is not conducive to improving the green innovation output performance of enterprises; Shareholders' discourse power affects the green innovation performance of enterprises through its role in enterprise growth. The growth of enterprises is conducive to improving the green innovation performance of enterprises. After a series of robustness tests, the conclusion is still valid.
The field of higher education research has bourgeoned in the past decades, addressing a wide range of topics. Being in a rapidly expanding and interdisciplinary field of research, higher education scholars have demonstrated exigency for aggregating research findings to map the research landscape, identify future research directions, and bridge the research-practice divide. In this connection, systematic literature reviews have been carried out to consolidate research findings. With a proliferation of systematic literature reviews in higher education, the aim of this meta, methodological review is to provide a state-of-the-art systematic literature review methodologies in the field of higher education. Adhering to the exploratory nature of this study, this review analyses systematic literature reviews published in 16 top-tiered international journals in higher education (n=160). Through qualitative research synthesis using thematic analysis and informed by grounded theory, a methodological framework comprising six stages and 20 steps is developed, which might help to instigate methodological dialogue between researchers when it comes to conducting systematic literature reviews. A handy checklist for conducting and evaluating systematic literature reviews in higher education is created.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.