2005
DOI: 10.1002/smj.455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualizing executive hubris: the role of (hyper-)core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
577
0
14

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 570 publications
(627 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
20
577
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…By 2007, it became clear that this romance with Goodwin's leadership style and perceptions of his positive impact were waining. Reflecting a important theme in the leadership literature concerning the dysfunctional consequences of managerial hubris, narcissism and executive overconfidence (Hiller & Hambrick, 2005;Shipman & Mumford, 2011), the collective self-confidence in RBS, built on Goodwin and his executive committee's reputation for making 'the right calls', was increasingly seen internally as collective arrogance. Interviewees linked it to the centralized, directive, micro-management style of Goodwin and his executive team and impact on organizational culture, and on a general unwillingness of his direct reports 'to speak up to power': Another interviewee suggested that this was the point he became convinced that confident judgment became arrogance:…”
Section: Reflections On Rbs During Its Growth Period: the Problems Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By 2007, it became clear that this romance with Goodwin's leadership style and perceptions of his positive impact were waining. Reflecting a important theme in the leadership literature concerning the dysfunctional consequences of managerial hubris, narcissism and executive overconfidence (Hiller & Hambrick, 2005;Shipman & Mumford, 2011), the collective self-confidence in RBS, built on Goodwin and his executive committee's reputation for making 'the right calls', was increasingly seen internally as collective arrogance. Interviewees linked it to the centralized, directive, micro-management style of Goodwin and his executive team and impact on organizational culture, and on a general unwillingness of his direct reports 'to speak up to power': Another interviewee suggested that this was the point he became convinced that confident judgment became arrogance:…”
Section: Reflections On Rbs During Its Growth Period: the Problems Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this importance many researchers investigated the nature and process of strategic decisions [1] but these studies mainly focus on the behavioral factors that affect the judgment of strategic decision makers [16]. An analytical comprehensiveness approach increases the performance of strategic decisions [4].…”
Section: Strategic Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflecting an important theme in the leadership literature concerning the dysfunctional consequences of managerial hubris, narcissism and executive overconfidence (Hiller and Hambrick 2005;Shipman and Mumford 2011), the collective self-confidence in RBS, built on Goodwin and his executive committee's reputation for making 'the right calls', was increasingly seen internally as collective arrogance. Interviewees linked it to the centralized, directive, micro-management style of Goodwin and his executive team and impact on organizational culture, and on a general unwillingness of his direct reports 'to speak up to power': I would say that confidence became more arrogance, with each successive acquisition .…”
Section: Reflections On Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%