Conceptualizing cultural leadership in physical education and youth sport: outlining a pedagogical concept

Storm, Louise Kamuk; Svendsen, Annemari Munk

doi:10.1080/13573322.2022.2065670

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 67 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This category was included in the analysis to determine the degree of spread of leadership in physical education around the world. Based on this review, three continents published articles in the field of leadership in physical education, namely the Asian continent there are six studies (Allami et al, 2022;Chang et al, 2021;Houshyar et al, 2020;Jiang & Jia, 2018;Mohammed et al, 2018;Podung et al, 2018), Continent of Europe also six studies (Clohessy et al, 2021;Ressler et al, 2021;Şirin et al, 2018;Storm & Svendsen, 2021;Tasdugen et al, 2020;Tzeni et al, 2019), and one more study represented by the Americas (Perez-Torralba et al,…”

Section: Countrymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This article uses questionnaires and interviews to collect research data. While the last article uses a heuristic approach (Storm & Svendsen, 2021). This heuristic approach refers to experience-based techniques for problem-solving, learning, and discovery that provide solutions that are not guaranteed to be optimal (Arthur & Robledo, 2021).…”

Section: Type Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Leadership in physical education: Systematic review of the last five years

Gazali

Saad²,

Cendra³

et al. 2022

SPORTIF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Leadership has been identified as an important factor that may help guide and contribute to the effective provision of physical education in several different contexts. Despite the importance attributed to physical education leadership, more empirical research evidence still needs to relate to the topic. The purpose of this review is to describe leadership research in physical education in the last five years (2018–2022). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were adopted for the research review, and two databases (Scopus and Web of Science) were used in article browsing. 741 articles were obtained from two databases (Scopus: 392 articles) and (WoS: 349 articles). After following the exclusion criteria, only 13 articles remained. The review succeeded in showing that Iraq publishes the most research, and quantitative, qualitative, mixed research (quantitative and qualitative) approaches, and heuristic approaches are the methods and types of research used, and then the review is divided into five research groups: (i) physical education teacher leadership, (ii) principals and departmental leadership, (iii) student leadership, (iv) school leadership, and (v) cultural leadership. Of these five groups, transformational leadership is the most frequently discussed topic. Future research can be continued with mapping analysis of research on this topic using bibliometric or scientometric studies. This literature review can also be continued by discussing the topic of leadership in sports.

show abstract

Section: Countrymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Type Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Leadership in physical education: Systematic review of the last five years

Gazali

Saad²,

Cendra³

et al. 2022

SPORTIF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Related to the structure of the environment, coaches might coordinate training camps and intense training periods with school exam periods, deliberately recruit and support role models, ensure communication within athletes' micro-environments (e.g., club, academy and national team training) and promote supportive training groups. In relation to organisational culture, coaches can acknowledge their role as cultural leaders ( 34 ), strive to develop a cohesive culture, stimulate athletes' free initiatives and maintain a long-term development focus. Sport psychology consultants are encouraged to conduct their interventions inside the athletes' natural settings and aim to optimise not only an athlete's individual psychological skills but the entire environment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The social environment of talent development in youth sport

Henriksen

Stambulova

2023

Front. Sports Act. Living

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the last decade, talent identification and development research that favours an individual perspective has been complemented by a focus on young athletes' social environments, termed “athletic talent development environments” (ATDEs). Two major lines of research have created a foundation for an ecological vision of talent development as the mutual accommodation between athletes and their ATDEs and of career development as an athlete's journey through various athletic and non-athletic environments. The Talent Development Environment Questionnaire allows the quantitative screening of athletes' environments, while the holistic ecological approach (HEA) promotes in-depth qualitative case studies of ATDEs. In this chapter, we focus mainly on the HEA, including: (a) two models that combine to illustrate an ATDE; (b) a summary of empirical case studies of successful environments in various sports and countries, culminating in a set of shared features of ATDEs that promote athletes' wellbeing and athletic and personal development; (c) an overview of recent trends within HEA (e.g. interorganisational collaboration in talent development) and (d) recommendations for coaches and sport psychology consultants, emphasising the importance of integrating efforts across the whole environment and building strong and coherent organisational cultures. In the discussion, we elaborate on developing the HEA discourse and point to future challenges for researchers and practitioners.

show abstract