Conceptualising informal institutions: Drawing on the case of guanxi

Abstract

Institutions regulate social life through formal rules and sanctions. These are distinguished from another source of social regulation, the informal incentives and constraints inherent in cultural currents and customary practices. Informal practices may be based not simply on cultural forces, though, but expectations regularised by informal rules and sanctions, which may operate as informal institutions. One approach holds that informal institutions arise out of formal institutional voids. Another holds that informal institutions operate in response to situations in which formal institutions frustrate the interests of individuals and groups who engage informal institutions to augment, compromise, or subvert formal institutions. After developing the concept of informal institution, the article goes on to indicate how an informal relationship pervasive in modern China, guanxi, may be understood as an informal institution. It is shown that by drawing on the case of guanxi the scope of the concept informal institution can be extended and also that our understanding of guanxi is enriched when the concept of informal institution is applied to its analysis.

The Potential of Informal Institutions in Promoting Green Enterpreneurship (Ge) and Sustainable Socio-Economic Development

“…a fundamental and integrated component of various activities and facilities within social structure theory (Barbalet, 2022).…”

The Role of the Informal Institution: How Does It Shape the Trust Relationship Between Government and Social Organizations in China?

“…Since culture and institution are not substitutive but mutually supportive, this form of institution must depend on cultural factors. Thus, it is possible to argue that guanxi (a type of informal relationship, pervasive in China and Chinese culture) draws from elements of Chinese culture (Barbalet, 2023). For instance, Wen (2013) demonstrates that in the rural areas of China, informal institutions are more effective in public goods provision than formal institutions and that villagers hold strong, blind trust toward informal authorities.…”

The impact of environmental, social, and governance ratings on corporate innovation: From the perspective of informal institutions

“…The investigation of this issue from the perspective of informal institutions brings interesting findings. In contrast to the coercive pressures of formal institutions, informal institutions emphasize the importance of guanxi, trust, and ethics in governance (Barbalet, 2022; Brockman et al, 2020; Carlin et al, 2009; Estrin & Prevezer, 2010). Those might be interpreted as limiting opportunistic behavior by reducing information transparency, which ultimately serves the purpose of governance.…”