Conceptualising differently-mobile passengers: geographies of everyday encumbrance in the railway station

Abstract

This paper develops ideas of differential mobility at the scale of the 'everyday' by investigating some of the complex relationships between mobility and immobility; facilitation and encumbrance when moving through railway stations. Drawing on in-depth qualitative research with rail passengers in Britain, the first section explores the entangled relationship between differently-mobile bodies and the station by considering some of the tensions that emerge between experiences of encumbrance and facilitation. Focus here is on how navigating through the station with different mobile objects, or 'prostheses', impacts on passengers in a variety of ways. Drawing on insights from science, technology and society studies, it demonstrates how moving with different objects gives rise to fluid apprehensions of both mobile objects and the built form of the station itself. However, and importantly, this section suggests that this fluidity also has the capacity to disrupt the intended affective dimensions of the built form. The second section explores how differently-mobile passengers move through the station with these mobile objects. Drawing on de Certeau's notion of 'tactics' and Ingold's idea of the 'taskscape', this section pulls out some of the practical knowledges that, through repetition, develop into skills and techniques for moving. In doing so, this paper seeks to illuminate some of the complex relationships between mobility, prosthetics, encumbrance and affectivity that emerge when moving through the railway station.

Developments and key issues in tourism mobilities

“…Studies of heritage tourism per seare sometimes too static, focusing on particular sites of meaning such as museums when, in fact, heritage can often be much more fluid both in tangible and intangible forms. Heritage railways provide us with a good example of the materialities of tourism mobilities, of literally heritage on the move (Schivelbusch,1986;Lofgren, 2008;Bissell, 2009;Aguiar, 2011). Several critiques have explored different aspects of railway mobility, such as therole of the body and the visual nature of being on the move (Bissell,2010;Johnson, 2010).…”

Traces of a Mobile Field: Ten Years of Mobilities Research

“…Theoretically, for instance, we note the rise of an ontological position that is more process-, performance-and practice-oriented, with mobilities being seen as emergent and in need of theorisation as such. This involves, for instance, the use and development of work by Goffman (Jensen, 2006(Jensen, , 2010Licoppe, 2009;Yeoh and Huang, 2010) and de Certeau (Bissell, 2009;Farías, 2010;Kidder, 2009), as well as on affect (Bissell, 2010;Conradson and Latham, 2007;Jensen et al, 2014), practices (Aldred and Jungnickel, 2013;Benson, 2011;Cresswell and Merriman, 2011;Hui, 2013;Larsen, 2008a), creating networks (Blok, 2010;Hui, 2012;Larsen et al, 2006;Larsen, 2008b;Nowicka, 2007;Ren, 2011) and the non-representational (McHugh, 2009;Spinney, 2011;Vannini, 2011). Relatedly, empirical analyses have privileged not the functionality of moving from A to B but experiences and socio-cultural constructions of mobilities (Cresswell, 2006;Jensen, 2009).…”

Rum, rytm och resande : Genusperspektiv på järnvägsstationer

“…Utifrån begreppen kropp och affekt har David Brissell undersökt resenärers olika upplevelser av mobilitet vid järnvägsstationer i Storbritannien (Brissell 2009a, Brissell 2009b, Adey, Brissell, McCormack & Merriman 2012. Brissell (2009a) närmar sig järnvägsstationen genom att undersöka hur dessa är tillgängliga för resenärer med kroppar med olika sorts mobilitet då kroppen länkas samman med exempelvis en cykel eller rull stol.…”