2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-011-9705-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual mastery and the knowledge argument

Abstract: According to Frank Jackson's famous knowledge argument, Mary, a brilliant neuroscientist raised in a black and white room and bestowed with complete physical knowledge, cannot know certain truths about phenomenal experience. This claim about knowledge, in turn, implies that physicalism is false. I argue that the knowledge argument founders on a dilemma. Either (i) Mary cannot know the relevant experiential truths because of trivial obstacles that have no bearing on the truth of physicalism or (ii) once the obs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 Though see Rabin 2011and Ball 2013, and Alter 2013 for reply. 35 See, e.g., Balog 2012, Papineau 2002.…”
Section: The Conceivability Gap Is Not Merely Semanticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Though see Rabin 2011and Ball 2013, and Alter 2013 for reply. 35 See, e.g., Balog 2012, Papineau 2002.…”
Section: The Conceivability Gap Is Not Merely Semanticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skill of analyzing information is the process of dividing and structuring information into smaller parts to recognize its pattern, connection, and various cause-effect of a complex scenario. Moreover, the students' thinking skill is very related to the learning devices employed during the scientific works (Boleng et al, 2018;Mapeala & Siew, 2015;Rabin, 2011;Yao et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Rabin [2020] for a recent discussion. For discussions of mastery for phenomenal concepts, see Ball [2009, 2013], Rabin [2011], and Alter [2013]. Note, though, that these discussions mostly focus on the ramifications of concept mastery for the knowledge argument, rather than on the kinds of issues addressed in this paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%