2010
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2009.175067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual issues related to the construction of prescriptive standards for the evaluation of postnatal growth of preterm infants

Abstract: Monitoring and interpreting the growth of preterm infants is a major clinical task for neonatologists. The effectiveness of this process depends upon the robustness of the standard selected. Concerns have been raised regarding the nature of the charts currently being used, as well as their appropriateness for present-day neonatal care. To overcome these problems, there is a need for new prescriptive standards based on a population of preterm infants without evidence of impaired fetal growth and born to low-ris… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…20,21 In addition, it should be acknowledged that the SAP standards we have used since the 70s did not regard obesity as a prevalent issue in this population. 22 The WHO is focused on developing growth standards for preterm infants with prescriptive guidelines based on the discrepancies observed in growth assessments in this risk group; 23,24 however, no data have been published to date. Although there are some reports available that show some results obtained with a similar project, 25,26 we still have doubts regarding the feasibility of finding a "healthy" preterm population that could serve as control, especially if they were born before reaching 28 weeks of gestation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 In addition, it should be acknowledged that the SAP standards we have used since the 70s did not regard obesity as a prevalent issue in this population. 22 The WHO is focused on developing growth standards for preterm infants with prescriptive guidelines based on the discrepancies observed in growth assessments in this risk group; 23,24 however, no data have been published to date. Although there are some reports available that show some results obtained with a similar project, 25,26 we still have doubts regarding the feasibility of finding a "healthy" preterm population that could serve as control, especially if they were born before reaching 28 weeks of gestation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Com a versão atualizada, é possível avaliar RNs a partir de 22 semanas de gestação e até 10 semanas após o termo (9). A desvantagem desse tipo de curva recai no fato de que crianças nascidas prematuras geralmente são menores do que fetos da mesma IG que nascerão a termo (11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Curvas De Crescimento Para Prematurosunclassified
“…Esse novo modelo propõe uma curva multiétnica e conceitualmente muito próxi-ma às novas curvas da Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS) (13,18).…”
Section: Curvas De Crescimento Para Prematurosunclassified
“…7 Asimismo, los criterios auxológicos para la definición y la construcción de curvas de referencia han evolucionado a nuevos criterios. 8 Cuando se elaboraron esas curvas, la supervivencia de los niños prematuros extremos (nacidos antes de la semana 28) era muy baja y no se disponía de la infraestructura y los tratamientos del presente. "Actualmente, la disponibilidad de nuevas terapéuticas, la creciente complejidad de las unidades de cuidados intensivos, la especialización en Neonatología y aún las subespecialidades de la misma han permitido la supervivencia de niños nacidos a las 24 o 25 semanas con algo más de 500 gramos al nacimiento".…”
unclassified