2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual hydrological model calibration using multi-objective optimization techniques over the transboundary Komadugu-Yobe basin, Lake Chad Area, West Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be attributed to a common cause variation in both variables in the basins; i.e., the variations were predominantly caused by climate variability or human activities [56]. Furthermore, years characterized with high periodicities are mostly associated with a combined effect of a high degree of climate variability and high impact of human activities in a basin [57]. As observed, there are varying degrees of high periodicities in the basin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be attributed to a common cause variation in both variables in the basins; i.e., the variations were predominantly caused by climate variability or human activities [56]. Furthermore, years characterized with high periodicities are mostly associated with a combined effect of a high degree of climate variability and high impact of human activities in a basin [57]. As observed, there are varying degrees of high periodicities in the basin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…As observed, there are varying degrees of high periodicities in the basin. This is an indication of the combined effect of climate variability and human activities in the basin [56,57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While assessment of a hydrological model's performance using multiple objective functions accounts for different uncertainties associated with a system (consequently producing representative set of the Pareto optimal solutions of model's parameters, preventing the simulation to be biased towards one objective function, and defining an exclusive solution that can maximize or minimize a particular independent preference [28,40]. For instance, the NSE represents the relative magnitude of the residual variance to observation variance [27] and could result in a misleading interpretation of model's ability [41]. Therefore different objective functions including NSE, KGE, R 2 , and PBI AS were used in this work to assess the performance of the HBV-light model during independent calibration and validation periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore different objective functions including NSE, KGE, R 2 , and PBI AS were used in this work to assess the performance of the HBV-light model during independent calibration and validation periods. These periods were carefully selected to account for different hydrological processes including peak, average, and low streamflow [42], hence accounting for reduced errors [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual sources of uncertainty in hydrological modelling are linked to the structure of the models, the calibration procedures, erroneous data used for calibration/validation and parameter instability (e.g. Beck 1987;Beven 2006;Coron et al 2012;Brigode et al 2013;Poissant et al 2017;Adeyeri et al 2020c;Ben Jaafar & Bargaoui 2020). However, to our knowledge, except Hakala et al (2018), who investigated the effect of equifinality of RRM parameters on GCM-RCM rating, there is no study that investigated the effect of hydrological modelling uncertainties on GCM-RCM evaluation performed by the RRM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%