2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration, spatial distribution, and health risk assessment of PFASs in serum of teenagers, tap water and soil near a Chinese fluorochemical industrial plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 b, PFOA accounted for the largest proportion of risk among PFASs (89.4%), followed by PFOS (7.0%) and PFHxS (1.80%). PFASs in teenagers may influence the reproductive system and character development of residents living near a Chinese fluorine chemical plant, as shown previously 52 . Drinking water provides the major ingestion pathway for PFASs, and they have a long half-life in the human body.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…3 b, PFOA accounted for the largest proportion of risk among PFASs (89.4%), followed by PFOS (7.0%) and PFHxS (1.80%). PFASs in teenagers may influence the reproductive system and character development of residents living near a Chinese fluorine chemical plant, as shown previously 52 . Drinking water provides the major ingestion pathway for PFASs, and they have a long half-life in the human body.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The average HQ values of reproductive toxicity and hepatotoxicity of PFOA were 6.02 × 10 -4 and 5.75 × 10 -3 , respectively, and the average HQ values of reproductive toxicity and hepatotoxicity of PFBA were 6.68 × 10 -7 and 1.34 × 10 -6 , respectively, indicating that PFOA and PFBA didn't pose the health risk to the target area. Some researchers believed that the detection of PFOS and PFOA in soil and groundwater near a fluorine chemical plant in China poses a much greater health risk than other fluorinated compounds (Wei et al, 2018;Xie et al, 2021). PFOS can suppress sheep red blood cellspecific immunoglobulin M production on mice, and cause hepatocellular hypertrophy in livers of rats (Peden-Adams et al, 2008;Butenhoff et al, 2012), even caused the death of newborn mice (Yahia et al, 2010).…”
Section: Ecological Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals have anti-androgenic effects that are mediated by mechanisms, such as interference with the androgen receptor, androgen production, metabolism, or signaling in the HPG axis [ 230 ]. Apart from making our daily life easier, plastic-originated agents and other endocrine-disrupting chemicals cause harm not only to the environment but also to the fertility and health of men.…”
Section: Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on testosterone levels and E2, a correlation of PFOS and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) levels with the delay of puberty in children (boys and girls) has also been demonstrated [ 234 ]. Higher levels of PFOS exposure are significantly associated with decreased serum testosterone concentrations in the male, which is age-specific and stronger in older men [ 230 ]. CYP11A1, a protein-coding gene, catalyzes the conversion of cholesterol to pregnenolone, and steroidogenesis starts with this reaction in all mammalian tissues [ 255 ].…”
Section: Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%