Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1007/s41468-019-00025-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing persistent homology with various coefficient fields in a single pass

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have not discussed in this paper any algorithmic complexity issues. The fact that we need rational coefficients certainly introduces new challenges, since most persistent homology related algorithms work with coefficients in the field Z/2Z [31] (but see also [5]). It will be interesting to develop efficient algorithms for computing harmonic representatives and weight vectors of bars as defined in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have not discussed in this paper any algorithmic complexity issues. The fact that we need rational coefficients certainly introduces new challenges, since most persistent homology related algorithms work with coefficients in the field Z/2Z [31] (but see also [5]). It will be interesting to develop efficient algorithms for computing harmonic representatives and weight vectors of bars as defined in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper by Edelsbrunner et al 1) showed an algorithm to compute a PD, and the algorithm has been refined theoretically and practically by subsequent researches. 2,[48][49][50][51][52] Parallel and distributed algorithms has been also studied. 53,54) Many researchers on PH have developed various data analysis software using PH, including Javaplex (http://ap pliedtopology.github.io/javaplex/), Perseus 55) (http://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/nanda/perseus/), PHAT 56) (https://bitbucket.org/phatcode/ph at/), Dipha 54) (https://github.com/DIPHA/dipha), Ripser 57) (https://github.com/Ripser/ripser), Gudhi (https://gudhi.inria.fr/), Dyonisys (https: //mrzv.org/sof tware/dionysus/, https://mr zv.org/sof tware/dionysus2/), R-TDA (https: //cran.r-project.org/package=TDA), EIRENE 51) (http://gregoryhenselman.org/eirene/), Cubical-Ripser (https://github.com/CubicalRipser), RIVET (https://github.com/rivetTDA/rivet), giotto-tda 58) (https://github.com/giottoai/giotto-tda), jHoles, 59) and HomCloud (https://homcloud.dev).…”
Section: Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successes of persistent homology stem in part from a strong theoretical foundation [52,23,35] and a focus on efficient algorithmic implementations [5,6,9,20,48]. That said, the inherent algorithmic problems are far from being solved-see [34] for a recent survey-and current theoretical approaches to abstract computations are limited to very specific cases [1,2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%