Computers in imaging and health care: Now and in the future

Abstract

Early picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) were characterized by the use of very expensive hardware devices, cumbersome display stations, duplication of database content, lack of interfaces to other clinical information systems, and immaturity in their understanding of the folder manager concepts and workflow reengineering. They were implemented historically at large academic medical centers by biomedical engineers and imaging informaticists. PACS were nonstandard, home-grown projects with mixed clinical acceptance. However, they clearly showed the great potential for PACS and filmless medical imaging. Filmless radiology is a reality today. The advent of efficient softcopy display of images provides a means for dealing with the ever-increasing number of studies and number of images per study. Computer power has increased, and archival storage cost has decreased to the extent that the economics of PACS is justifiable with respect to film. Network bandwidths have increased to aliow large studies of many megabytes to arrive at display stations within seconds of examination completion. PACS vendors have recognized the need for efficient workflow and have built systems with intelligence in the management of patient data. Close integration with the hospital information system (HiS)-radiology information system (RIS) is critical for system functionality. Successful implementation of PACS requires integration or interoperation with hospital and radiology information systems. Besides the economic advantages, secure rapid access to all clinical information on patients, including imaging studies, anytime and anywhere, enhances the quality of patient care, although it is difficult to quantify. Medical image management systems are maturing, providing access outside of the radiology department to images and clinical information throughout the hospital or the enterprise via the Internet. Small and medium-sized community hospitals, private practices, and outpatient centers in rural areas will begin realizing the benefits of PACS already realized by the large tertiary care academic medical centers and research institutions. Hand-held devices and the Worldwide Web are going to change the way people communicate and do business. The impact on health care will be huge, including radiology. Computer-aided diagnosis, decision support tools, virtual imaging, and guidance systems will transform our practice as value-added applications utilizing the technologies pushed by PACS development efforts.Outcomes data and the electronic medical record (EMR) will drive our interactions with referring physicians and we expect the radiologist to become the informaticist, a new version of the medical management consultant. Copyright 9 2000 by W.B. Saunders CompanyKEY WORDS: picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), image storage and retrieval, folder manager, workflow manager, radiology information systems, computers, digital radiology. EARLY USES OF COMPUTERS IN RADIOLOGYC OMPUTERS have been used in radiology for many years...

Economic impact of real-time teleradiology in thoracic CT examinations

“…Many reports have indicated improvement in the diagnostic clinical accuracy of the primary health care practitioners after radiological consultation [18,19,20]. Teleradiology provides an opportunity for timely radiological consultation with the practitioner at the time of clinical decision-making.…”

Evaluating the Implementation of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems in Newfoundland and Labrador—a Cost Benefit Analysis

“…However, our analysis estimated the average an exam generated in PACS will cost $2.65 more than one created in the film environment, supporting the argument that it can be challenging to justify the need for PACS in "low" volume sites. 32 Capital and operational costs associated with the implementation of PACS in the Western Health Authority were very costly. The most significant contributor to the cost of PACS and the main reason for not realizing a financial return on investment were equipment and maintenance costs.…”

Workflow and Standardization

“…Dramatic advances in workflow technologies [1,2] and open architecture [3,4] have recently led to widespread development focused on automating and integrating information system such as the PACS, HIS, RIS and EMRs [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Automation and integration of work routines from various systems leads to a situation where a number of users, such as radiologists, intervention radiologists and surgeons, are co-operating and communicating through integrated workstations.…”