1988
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(88)90027-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized optimization of 125I implants in brain tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some require interactive reconfiguration by the user, assisted by sophisticated manipulation and display capability, 71 and others involve automatic adjustments of source positions and/or strengths. [72][73][74] In one of the latter, 74 125 I seed positions are iteratively leastsquares optimized, first with only one seed per catheter and then after each of a sequence of maneuvers in which nearestneighbor catheters are combined; the combinations, which continue as long as reasonable goodness-of-fit is maintained, serve both to reduce the number of skull penetrations necessary and to separate individual catheters enough that retainer buttons on the surface do not interfere with one another. For automatic position adjustments in this type of optimization, it is essential ͑for convergence͒ that seeds be constrained not to move outside a three-dimensional bit-map structure conforming either to target contours drawn on the scans or, if desired, to smaller contours ͑e.g., the enhancement margin presumed to indicate tumor͒.…”
Section: Image-based Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some require interactive reconfiguration by the user, assisted by sophisticated manipulation and display capability, 71 and others involve automatic adjustments of source positions and/or strengths. [72][73][74] In one of the latter, 74 125 I seed positions are iteratively leastsquares optimized, first with only one seed per catheter and then after each of a sequence of maneuvers in which nearestneighbor catheters are combined; the combinations, which continue as long as reasonable goodness-of-fit is maintained, serve both to reduce the number of skull penetrations necessary and to separate individual catheters enough that retainer buttons on the surface do not interfere with one another. For automatic position adjustments in this type of optimization, it is essential ͑for convergence͒ that seeds be constrained not to move outside a three-dimensional bit-map structure conforming either to target contours drawn on the scans or, if desired, to smaller contours ͑e.g., the enhancement margin presumed to indicate tumor͒.…”
Section: Image-based Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With two-dimensional 2D multiplanar or 3D imaging processing, the size, shape, and main axis of intracranial lesions can be determined along with the important surrounding anatomical structures. Computer calculations and graphic capabilities contribute to optimized dosimetry for interstitial radiotherapy and convergent beam external radiotherapy (5,10,24,28,33). This information can be transposed into stereotactic space with mathematical accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highly localized treatment requires a 3D configuration of the isodose distribution curves adjusted to tumoral volume and shape. 5 which allows an easy detection of faulty contours. Computer dose calculations for interstitial implants of radioactive seeds are based on the knowledge of the spatial coordinates for each seed.…”
Section: Interstitial Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inverse treatment planning is used. The desired surface dose, implantation time, and trephination point(s) are selected manually and a seed configuration yielding optimal coverage of the tumor with the prescribed dose is calculated automatically by minimization of an appropriate objective function (Bauer-Kirpes et al, 1988) (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%