2021
DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202011-1372oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized Mortality Prediction for Community-acquired Pneumonia at 117 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models that highlight vital signs and laboratory tests may be more valid in alerting healthcare workers to potentially modifiable organ failure than models that rely heavily on comorbidities and demographic characteristics ( Jones et al, 2021 ). Based on this spirit, our study established the accuracy of computerized prediction and revealed that the XGBoost algorithm was reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Models that highlight vital signs and laboratory tests may be more valid in alerting healthcare workers to potentially modifiable organ failure than models that rely heavily on comorbidities and demographic characteristics ( Jones et al, 2021 ). Based on this spirit, our study established the accuracy of computerized prediction and revealed that the XGBoost algorithm was reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a model is a summarization of the collective clinical experience of events that happen in patients with similar clinical characteristics ( Weick and Roberts, 1993 ). The value of prediction is that it places the clinical features of a new patient in the context of that clinical experience, providing a common basis for communication among clinicians, especially for those unfamiliar with each other ( Jones et al, 2021 ). Credible models are essential to providing reliable, efficient, and equitable health care, and the models we have built are paving the way for that process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From our perspective, limitations especially regarding applicability in the study by Hu et al arise in view of the small case number and choice of a large variable set (76 variables). In a recently published US study, ML algorithms were applied using PSI-specific and additional variables derived from electronic health records (EHR) of 297,498 CAP patients [14]. The ML methods outperformed LR among different models in predicting 30-day mortality (AUC range 0.83-0.87).…”
Section: Existing Prediction Models and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to non-COVID SARI patients, several approaches for mortality prediction in patients with pneumonia in general and specifically with influenza-caused pneumonia were also reported. The methodology of those studies included different ML concepts [13][14][15][16] as well as logistic regression (LR) [14,17,18]. The authors mostly focused on developing individual risk stratification and mortality prediction models for assessing the patient's individual risk at the time point of hospital admission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooper et al constructed 11 statistical and machine learning models that predict dire outcomes for CAP patients (such as mortality or severe clinical complications) and discovered an innovative neural network learning method that induced a model using Multitask and Learning along with Rank-prop learning (MTLR) with the largest ROC area (Cooper et al, 2005). Models that highlight vital signs and laboratory tests may be more valid in alerting healthcare workers to potentially modifiable organ failure than models that rely heavily on comorbidities and demographic characteristics (Jones et al, 2021). Based on this spirit, our study established the accuracy of computerized prediction and revealed that the XGBoost algorithm was reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%