2022
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.903426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Abstract: Background: The ability to assess adverse outcomes in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) could improve clinical decision-making to enhance clinical practice, but the studies remain insufficient, and similarly, few machine learning (ML) models have been developed.Objective: We aimed to explore the effectiveness of predicting adverse outcomes in CAP through ML models.Methods: A total of 2,302 adults with CAP who were prospectively recruited between January 2012 and March 2015 across three cities in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a range of machine-learning models for comparison, including both established and newer ones. We used random forest (RF) ( Dey et al, 2020 ), gradient boosting (GB) ( Xu et al, 2022 ), and support vector machine (SVM) ( Xiang et al, 2020 ), which are frequently used models in medical studies. These models were implemented using the scikit-learn library in Python 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a range of machine-learning models for comparison, including both established and newer ones. We used random forest (RF) ( Dey et al, 2020 ), gradient boosting (GB) ( Xu et al, 2022 ), and support vector machine (SVM) ( Xiang et al, 2020 ), which are frequently used models in medical studies. These models were implemented using the scikit-learn library in Python 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the XGBoost algorithm consistently outperformed others, demonstrating high accuracy, precision, recall, and AUC values. This fixed once again key clinical factors in ML in comparison with traditional models [36].…”
Section: Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%