2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2005.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized detection of breast masses in digitized mammograms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With SVM classifier sensitivity increases up to moments of order 20, but decreases with high-order moments. Table 3 compares [46] Gray level, BPN Private 94 % Sensitivity contour-related, and morphological Polakowski et al [36] Size, shape, MLP Private 92 % TPR/FPR and texture the classification rates of both the classifiers with different orders of Zernike moments on the two datasets. All results of k-NN classifier are generated with k = 10.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With SVM classifier sensitivity increases up to moments of order 20, but decreases with high-order moments. Table 3 compares [46] Gray level, BPN Private 94 % Sensitivity contour-related, and morphological Polakowski et al [36] Size, shape, MLP Private 92 % TPR/FPR and texture the classification rates of both the classifiers with different orders of Zernike moments on the two datasets. All results of k-NN classifier are generated with k = 10.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The features extracted give the property of the texture, and are keep in knowledge base. [1]. the extracted features are compare with the unknown sample means the…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The over-sampling ratio is set to 200%. For the other three comparative methods, five types of features (a total of 20 features) are extracted for each ROI: iris filter descriptors, gray level descriptors, texture descriptors, contour-related descriptors, and morphological descriptors [15].…”
Section: Evaluating the Ssrbm For Few Labeled Mass Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 99%