1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(99)00304-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer simulation of electroinjection analysis and electrophoretically mediated microanalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longer reaction tubes cause expansion of the product dispersion owing to the nonuniform flow profile. In addition to the effective mix of analyte and reagent in EIA and EMMA and the inherent sensitivity derived from the lack of dispersion, the product formed can be concentrated at the boundary of the reagent due to the effect of kinematic focusing theoretically predicted [15,19,21] and then experimentally verified. Kinematic focusing occurs when the reagent concentration is much higher than that of the analyte and when the electrophoretic mobility of the reaction product is close or equal to the electrophoretic mobility of the reagent.…”
Section: Emma and Eiamentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Longer reaction tubes cause expansion of the product dispersion owing to the nonuniform flow profile. In addition to the effective mix of analyte and reagent in EIA and EMMA and the inherent sensitivity derived from the lack of dispersion, the product formed can be concentrated at the boundary of the reagent due to the effect of kinematic focusing theoretically predicted [15,19,21] and then experimentally verified. Kinematic focusing occurs when the reagent concentration is much higher than that of the analyte and when the electrophoretic mobility of the reaction product is close or equal to the electrophoretic mobility of the reagent.…”
Section: Emma and Eiamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The foundations of these two approaches can be established by resorting to flow-injection analysis (FI), as considered by some research groups as predecessor of both [11,18,19]. The improvement of sample and reagent mixing without an increase in product dispersion in FI is the key for maximizing sensitivity, especially in the case of rapid kinetics analysis.…”
Section: Emma and Eiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that another variant of analyte and reagent mixing called EIA was proposed by Andreev et al [7,34,35], based on the same idea as EMMA. EIA and EMMA are a pair of mutually complementary methods of chemical analysis that can be realized with the help of a CE instrument.…”
Section: Eiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the dynamic models referred to above, this approach is based upon the modeling of the trajectories of each individual molecule, requires extremely powerful computers in order to compute the motion of a statistically significant number of molecules and is not further considered in this review. Other theoretical work absent from this review includes (i) a stochastic model describing the consequences of wall adsorption in CE [84], (ii) the temperature-dependent interconversion models of dynamic electrophoresis [85][86][87][88], (iii) the simulation model for electroinjection analysis and electrophoretically mediated microanalysis [89], (iv) the affinity electrophoresis models of Andreev et al [90] and Fang and Chen [91][92][93][94], which describe affinity interactions in CE under simplified electromigration conditions, (v) the models of Cann and coworkers describing interacting systems in ZE [95], MBE [96] and IEF [97][98][99], (vi) the models predicting analyte separation in CEC [100][101][102][103][104], (vii) all multi-dimensional models that describe electrokinetically driven mass transport and separations in microfabricated chip devices, such as those of Ermakov et al [105], Bianchi et al [106], Chatterjee [107], Sounart and Baygents [108], Datta and Ghosal [109] and Hirokawa et al [110], (viii) the model of electrokinetic sample injection for capillary CZE with consideration of the electrode configuration [111], (ix) the models that predict sample zone formation, distortion and solute separation in continuous flow electrophoresis [112,113] and recycling electrophoresis [114][115][116], (x) the models describing off-gel electrophores...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%