Hard-to-Measure Goods and Services 2007
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226044507.003.0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Input, Computer Networks, and Productivity

Abstract: This paper reports the results of research and analysis undertaken by the authors. It has undergone a more limited review than official publications. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Census Bureau. This report is distributed to inform interested parties of research and to encourage discussion.We have benefited from comments by Randy Becker and Jack Triplett; Mark Roberts, the editors, and other participants at the NBER Conference on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the findings associated with RFID, EDI has also been linked to higher labor efficiency (Atrostic and Nguyen 2002, Pilat 2004). EDI enables personnel (e.g., nurses, transporters, materials managers, hospital administrators) to spend more time on value‐added tasks instead of non‐value‐added tasks.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Similar to the findings associated with RFID, EDI has also been linked to higher labor efficiency (Atrostic and Nguyen 2002, Pilat 2004). EDI enables personnel (e.g., nurses, transporters, materials managers, hospital administrators) to spend more time on value‐added tasks instead of non‐value‐added tasks.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…To test for complementarity Table 5 reports the interaction terms controlling for the adoption of any two systems together in Column (1) to (3). Indicating no complementarity between any two enterprise software applications at a first glance no interaction term turns out to be significant in the regressions containing two different enterprise systems.…”
Section: Complementarity and Interaction Between The Enterprise Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this robustness check is not sufficient I also conducted the likelihood-ratio testing procedure for two practices, namely SCM and CRM, but only if ERP is also in use. The appropriate one-sided t-test reports a complementarity relationship significant at the one percent level and thus strengthens the results of Table 2.5 11 .…”
Section: Alternative Procedures To Test For Complementaritysupporting
confidence: 76%