2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1439658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enterprise Systems and Labor Productivity: Disentangling Combination Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Omitting these factors could artificially inflate the estimated effects of sector-level digital adoption rates. To control for this possibility, we extend the model with two additional control variables: (i) the OECD indicator of the impact of upstream anticompetitive regulations in each sector (Conway and Nicoletti, 2006[59]; Égert and Wanner, 2016 [60]), and (ii) a new indicator of sectoral occupational shortages recently published in the OECD Skills for Jobs Database (2018 [57] regulatory burdens and lack of skills have the expected negative association with productivity performance, 18 the finding that higher digital adoption rates are associated with higher MFP growth remains largely unaffected when we account for the direct influence of these variables (Annex Table B.4, Panel C).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Omitting these factors could artificially inflate the estimated effects of sector-level digital adoption rates. To control for this possibility, we extend the model with two additional control variables: (i) the OECD indicator of the impact of upstream anticompetitive regulations in each sector (Conway and Nicoletti, 2006[59]; Égert and Wanner, 2016 [60]), and (ii) a new indicator of sectoral occupational shortages recently published in the OECD Skills for Jobs Database (2018 [57] regulatory burdens and lack of skills have the expected negative association with productivity performance, 18 the finding that higher digital adoption rates are associated with higher MFP growth remains largely unaffected when we account for the direct influence of these variables (Annex Table B.4, Panel C).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With data from Korean SMEs, SCM use is significantly and positively associated with total factor productivity (TFP), while ERP and CRM are not (Shin (2006)). German firms benefitted most from the systems when they had adopted all three systems, ERP, SCM and CRM, together (Engelstätter (2013)). …”
Section: Literature and Background Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is argued that enterprise systems increase firm performance, e. g. [1,11,19], their impact on innovational performance is at the moment only suspected. Empirical evidence concerning a relationship between enterprise systems and innovational performance is still missing at present.…”
Section: Long-term Impacts and Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is no suspicion, no case study evidence and neither a theoretical argument that a complementarity relationship among the enterprise systems, as shown for their impact on labor productivity in [11], could foster the innovational impact of enterprise systems, an effect based on potential complementarity cannot be ruled out completely. However, as the current analysis forms a starting point concerning the relationship between innovational performance and enterprise systems, revealing any complementarity aspects was no aim of this study and is accordingly passed on to future research.…”
Section: Long-term Impacts and Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%