1993
DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1993.tb06024.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer‐Generated Pumping Schedules for Satisfying Operational Objectives

Abstract: A new computer program can assist engineers, water utility managers, and pump station operators in selecting the most cost‐effective combination of pumps to meet a specific system requirement over a given time period. The program provides operators with two options: (1) finding the least‐cost pump combination that will place tank levels at desired elevations at the end of a specified time period, and (2) finding the most efficient pump combination that will supply a required pump demand over a specified time p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(3 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, investigations related to cost optimization of pumping expenses relied on operational research techniques as, for instance, linear programming [6,7], integral linear programming [8], nonlinear programming [9,10], and dynamic programming [11,12]. Wood and Reddy (1994) [13] were the first to utilize genetic algorithms (GA) to reduce the energetic cost of pumping systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, investigations related to cost optimization of pumping expenses relied on operational research techniques as, for instance, linear programming [6,7], integral linear programming [8], nonlinear programming [9,10], and dynamic programming [11,12]. Wood and Reddy (1994) [13] were the first to utilize genetic algorithms (GA) to reduce the energetic cost of pumping systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent papers describing the implementation of DSSs include a $120 million computer overflowregulation system for reducing sewage discharges into the Mississippi River (Batzel, 1994), several programs for managing and predicting the quality in various urban water distribution systems (Deininger et al, 1992;Grayman and Clark, 1993;Orr et al, 1992), a program for determining water distribution pumping schedules in Texas (Chase and Ormsbee, 1993), a program for integrating hydraulic models with a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) simulator in Illinois (Schulte and Maim, 1993), a river-aquifer simulation program applied to water supply planning and operation in New Jersey (Wan and Levy, 1993;Frank, 1994), and a program for regional development and environmental planning in China (Fedra, 1992a;Fedra et al, 1992b), to cite only a few. DSSs for simulating river system design and operation include those developed by Andreu (1991), Basson et al (1994), the Center for Advanced Decision Support for Water and Environmental Systems (1992), Eichert (1992), Ford (1990), Hydrologic Engineering Center (1993, Hydrological Modelling Unit in New South Wales, Australia (1994)k Kuczera (1990Kuczera ( , 1993, Loucks et al (1995), Randall et al (1995), and Stockholm Environment Institute (1993).…”
Section: Impacts Of Dss In Environmental and Water Resources Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, there are algorithms for operational optimisation of WDNs based on linear programming (Jowitt and Germanopoulos, 1992), nonlinear programming (Chase and Ormsbee, 1993;Yu et al, 1994), dynamic programming (Lansey and Awumah, 1994;Nitivattananon et al, 1996), and heuristics (Ormsbee and Reddy, 1995;Leon et al, 2000). However, these algorithms had limited success because of various reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%