2018
DOI: 10.1071/rdv30n6_fo
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-assisted sperm analysis and reproductive science; a gift for understanding gamete biology from multidisciplinary perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This incompatibility of results can be explained by the type of motility analysis. The CASA-Mot (Holt, Cummins, & Soler, 2018;Soler, Cooper, Valverde, & Yániz, 2016) system ignores most of the cells with no real displacement, while in the subjective analysis the movement of the spermatozoa tail can be included in the oscillatory motile cells. Therefore, before comparing results, it is important to consider the existence of different concepts of motile spermatozoa depending on the approach used for motility analysis (subjective or objective).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This incompatibility of results can be explained by the type of motility analysis. The CASA-Mot (Holt, Cummins, & Soler, 2018;Soler, Cooper, Valverde, & Yániz, 2016) system ignores most of the cells with no real displacement, while in the subjective analysis the movement of the spermatozoa tail can be included in the oscillatory motile cells. Therefore, before comparing results, it is important to consider the existence of different concepts of motile spermatozoa depending on the approach used for motility analysis (subjective or objective).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) dates back to the 1980s. It was developed in the academic community (Holt et al ., 1985) and progressed rapidly by commercial entities [for reviews, see Holt et al . (2018) and the associated special issue].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional possibility is that differences between subpopulations may relate to variation in an individual's strategy and that a strict genetic basis for this trait must be viewed with caution. More work is needed to understand the meaning of these results, but it could be hypothesized that a combination of genetic and external factors may be responsible for the distribution of spermatozoa in different subpopulations of an individual [60][61][62][63][64]. Although there are differences between animals, important questions still arise with regards to whether the proportions of spermatozoa in each subpopulation remain constant over time or if they vary with time in a given male.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%