1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb10229.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer‐Assisted, Semi‐Programmed, and Teaching Assistant‐Led Instruction in General Chemistry

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate computer-assisted instruction and semi-programmed instruction as replacements for traditional recitation/discussion in general chemistry. Student performance on problem solving and student attitudes were investigated. The study also examined the effect offormal reasoning ability as a covariate. The data indicated that for simple exercises, all methods of teaching recitation/discussion sections were equally effective, but for more difficult exercises, the semiprogram… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there have been substantial amounts of research comparing Web-based tutorials to traditional face-to-face lectures, few have found not so promising results in student performance for Web-based tutorials beginning with Cracolice and Abraham (1996) and Sweeney and Ingram (2001) who agreed that while Web-based tutorials are more innovative and enjoyable, students assigned to traditional lecture environments, in most instances, outperformed their counterparts assigned to the Web-based environment. Likewise, Debord and colleagues (2004) found similar results as student performance in introductory psychology classes was not improved by making Web-based tutorials available versus face-to-face lectures.…”
Section: Greater Student Performance With Face-to-face Lecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have been substantial amounts of research comparing Web-based tutorials to traditional face-to-face lectures, few have found not so promising results in student performance for Web-based tutorials beginning with Cracolice and Abraham (1996) and Sweeney and Ingram (2001) who agreed that while Web-based tutorials are more innovative and enjoyable, students assigned to traditional lecture environments, in most instances, outperformed their counterparts assigned to the Web-based environment. Likewise, Debord and colleagues (2004) found similar results as student performance in introductory psychology classes was not improved by making Web-based tutorials available versus face-to-face lectures.…”
Section: Greater Student Performance With Face-to-face Lecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inability to deal with expected results and the under-use of features by students who did not successfully use the tutorials were cited as some of the factors that hindered student use of Web-based tutorials. Similarly, Cracolice and Abraham (1996) concluded that, as the difficulty of the problems in a chemistry class increased, students assigned to the printed workbook condition outperformed students assigned to the Web-based tutorial condition. An inference from the research conducted by Elicker, O'Malle, and Williams (2008) showed that the Web-based instructional tools made available to students were ineffective in increasing their performance compared to the easier communication with the instructor.…”
Section: Student Performance Using Web-based Tutorialsmentioning
confidence: 99%