2013
DOI: 10.28945/1809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web-based Tutorials and Traditional Face-to-Face Lectures: A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance

Abstract: The authors present the results of a study conducted at a historically Black institution that compares student performance using Web-based tutorials to that of the traditional face-to-face lectures. A casual-comparative design was chosen for this study to examine the effects of instructional delivery on student performance in a business communications course with specific emphasis on the grammar and mechanics unit of study. The study spanned 4 years, beginning fall 2008 through spring 2012. Participants includ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these findings are contradicted with the results documented by Misopoulos et al, (2018) (32) ; Stöhr et al ., (2016) ; (33) Haughton et al ., (2015) (34) ; Wilson et al, (2014) (35) ; Guy et al ., (2013) (36) ; Bowen et al ., (2012) (37) ; Driscroll et al ., (2012) (38) ; Ary et al ., (2011) (39) and Figlio et al, (2010) (40) , who found that, there was not any statistical significant differences of students performance pre and post intervention between traditional and online students.…”
Section: Concerningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these findings are contradicted with the results documented by Misopoulos et al, (2018) (32) ; Stöhr et al ., (2016) ; (33) Haughton et al ., (2015) (34) ; Wilson et al, (2014) (35) ; Guy et al ., (2013) (36) ; Bowen et al ., (2012) (37) ; Driscroll et al ., (2012) (38) ; Ary et al ., (2011) (39) and Figlio et al, (2010) (40) , who found that, there was not any statistical significant differences of students performance pre and post intervention between traditional and online students.…”
Section: Concerningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online delivery. In support of the online delivery method, online videos allow ease of access to course content with the flexibility to review content multiple times as and when required (Khatony et al, 2009;Guy and Lownes-Jackson, 2013). Online materials must not simply be recordings of pre-existing lectures, but leverage appropriate technologies to add value to the learning experience (Williams et al, 2012).…”
Section: Content Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This blended approach is considered an effective delivery method due to the variable attention spans and knowledge retention of students (Wilson and Korn, 2007;Kim et al, 2014;McCutcheon et al, 2015;Green and Whitburn, 2016). It can also be highly effective in delivering course content to students at anytime and anywhere in the world, allowing a degree of flexibility unattainable by traditional F2F methods (Guy and Lownes-Jackson, 2013;Kharb and Samanta, 2016;Liu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%