1995
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/10.suppl_1.60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-assisted semen analysis systems: comparison with routine evaluation and prognostic value in male fertility and assisted reproduction

Abstract: Semen analysis was performed by employing a computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) system (SM-CMA), in comparison with visual estimation by microscope. There was a significant relationship between the values obtained by both methods, but a large range of differences in individual values was observed. Results of semen analysis in 407 men complaining of reduced fertility were investigated for their relationship to fertility outcome. The parameters obtained by the CASA system were analysed in relation to time to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
57
3
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
57
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have attempted to relate motion parameters as well as in vivo fertility and IVF in both humans and animals using average value and parametric statistical approach (Holt et al 1985, 1997, Marshburn et al 1992, Barratt et al 1993, Krause 1995, MacLeod & Irvine 1995. However, this approach considers a normal distribution of all variables, while semen is made up of billions of individual spermatozoa that make this regular distribution unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have attempted to relate motion parameters as well as in vivo fertility and IVF in both humans and animals using average value and parametric statistical approach (Holt et al 1985, 1997, Marshburn et al 1992, Barratt et al 1993, Krause 1995, MacLeod & Irvine 1995. However, this approach considers a normal distribution of all variables, while semen is made up of billions of individual spermatozoa that make this regular distribution unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently several objective methods have been developed to measure sperm horizontal movement, the CASA being the most widely used one (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Although CASA gives multiple sperm motility parameters, their correlation with fertility potential of spermatozoa is not well defined (23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Some workers have analyzed sperm cells showing upward movement against the gravity by spectrophotometric methods (28,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, all the available techniques consider only the ''horizontal'' velocity and there is not a single instrument available for measuring the ''vertical'' velocity of spermatozoa. The sophisticated computer aided semen analyzer (CASA) based on microscopic video photographic method is widely used for estimating sperm horizontal velocity from the horizontal plane of a glass slide or haemocytometer or Makler Chamber (23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Another objective method of sperm motility analysis is the spectrophotometric/turbidimetric method described by Sokoloski et al (28) and simplified and made user-friendly by Majumder and Chakrabarti (29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of sperm motility represents an important parameter because it is significantly correlated with the total number of offspring born, for example, fertility (Barnett et al, 1993;Krause, 1995;Parkinson, 2009). It is an accepted fact that normal ejaculates do contain a small percentage of spermatozoa that are abnormal in morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%