Computed Tomographic and Magnetic Resonance Colonography: Challenge for Colonoscopy

Abstract

Background: Computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) colonography are new noninvasive techniques to examine the colon. Methods: A literature search was performed through 2/1/2012, and relevant studies included in the review. Results: MR colonography is evolving, and holds the promise that it may achieve high-level sensitivity for adenomas and cancers without exposure to radiation. CT colonography is much more mature at this point in time, and has received great attention in the last decade as a colon imaging tool, including potentially as a primary colon cancer screening method. Its accuracy for detection of polypoid lesions ≥1 cm is high, likely close to that of colonoscopy. New techniques focusing on minimally prepped CT colonography hold the potential of making the procedure more widely accepted. While radiation exposure with CT colonography is a concern, this risk is likely very modest, particularly if used in patients over the age of 50. CT colonography, while a viable colon cancer screening modality in the USA, could not be widely implemented, largely because of lack of standards for training and reading, and because the number of skilled readers is limited. Summary: MR and CT colonography are relatively novel and exciting modalities that can be used to identify colonic lesions. They promise a high level of sensitivity and pose essentially no (MR) or modest (CT) risks. Future investigation will likely lead to wider acceptance of both of these tests, including perhaps to their use in colon cancer screening programs.

1H‐MR spectroscopy characterization of the adipose tissue associated with colorectal tumor

“…1 H‐MRI is able to define Circumferential Resection Margin (CRM) and to detect the metastatic lymph nodes (N‐stage) in perivisceral fat even in proximity of the mesorectal fascia . 1 H‐MRI colonography is a relatively novel and exciting modality that can be used to identify colonic lesions and to assess the stage of colorectal tumor, but, at the moment, only few centers in United States and Europe apply this technique in the rectal area .…”

The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis

“…Also, bowel preparation, which is an important barrier in colonoscopy screening, 7,44 is likely to be less burdensome for imaging techniques. 24,45 Therefore, higher participation rates may be achievable. This is underlined by the findings in a Dutch trial comparing colonoscopy and CTC screening in which participation rates were 22% and 34%, respectively.…”