2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-012-9431-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computations of Absolute Permeability on Micro-CT Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
250
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 395 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
13
250
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Works have been done on the effect of sample size and resolution, however almost all of them are done separately [31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. The effect of sample size is well studied since Bear [38] brought up the idea of representative element volume (REV), which is the smallest volume over which the measurement result is representative of the macroscopic property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Works have been done on the effect of sample size and resolution, however almost all of them are done separately [31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. The effect of sample size is well studied since Bear [38] brought up the idea of representative element volume (REV), which is the smallest volume over which the measurement result is representative of the macroscopic property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of sample size is well studied since Bear [38] brought up the idea of representative element volume (REV), which is the smallest volume over which the measurement result is representative of the macroscopic property. Many researchers checked the sample size to achieve REV [31,33,[39][40][41][42], but they ignored the influence of resolution. Though difference between experiment and DRA might be concluded to inadequate resolution [27,30,43], quantitative study of resolution effect is few [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We provide in Table 3 the simulation results (Figure 6) of the absolute permeability along with the relative errors. For convenience the permeability is written in Darcy unit, 1 D = 9.869 233 × 10 −13 m 2 in line with the practice in the literature [4,5], the values in Table 3 are expressed in milliDarcy (mD), 1 mD = 10 −3 D. The difference is less than 2% suggesting that the implemented finite volume method (FVM) is capable to simulate accurately at the pore-scale. Unlike in the LBM, extension of our FVM model to non-Newtonian fluid can be handled without any numerical tuning parameters.…”
Section: Flow In Porous Mediamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is function of the complex microstructure of the rock, fluid properties (density, viscosity) and parameters (velocity). Since no simple universal correlation exists for the permeability, an accurate and efficient numerical tool to predict the permeability is highly desirable [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation